XMVM vs. CSMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX).
XMVM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. CSMIX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jul 25, 1986.
Performance
XMVM vs. CSMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMVM vs. CSMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 2.15% | 18.46% | 11.73% | 16.31% | -8.21% | 35.15% | 5.68% | 30.38% | -9.62% | 2.79% |
CSMIX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I | -1.68% | 14.65% | 8.66% | 21.42% | -8.87% | 28.95% | 7.82% | 21.01% | -18.37% | 13.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMVM achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly higher than CSMIX's -1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, XMVM has outperformed CSMIX with an annualized return of 11.62%, while CSMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.52% annualized return.
XMVM
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- 1Y
- 26.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
CSMIX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -7.18%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 22.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMVM vs. CSMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CSMIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XMVM vs. CSMIX — Risk / Return Rank
XMVM
CSMIX
XMVM vs. CSMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMVM | CSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 0.97 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 1.48 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.19 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 1.28 | +0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.24 | 4.63 | +2.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMVM | CSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 0.97 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.35 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.44 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.47 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMVM and CSMIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XMVM vs. CSMIX - Dividend Comparison
XMVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than CSMIX's 14.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 2.07% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
CSMIX Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I | 14.47% | 14.23% | 6.67% | 7.57% | 6.02% | 13.34% | 0.50% | 3.58% | 9.79% | 11.56% | 11.58% | 12.73% |
Drawdowns
XMVM vs. CSMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMVM drawdown since its inception was -62.83%, which is greater than CSMIX's maximum drawdown of -53.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVM and CSMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMVM | CSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.83% | -53.37% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.61% | -14.79% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.12% | -25.98% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.07% | -48.42% | +3.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.32% | -10.23% | +3.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.34% | -8.95% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.68% | 4.09% | -0.41% |
Volatility
XMVM vs. CSMIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) is 4.49%, while Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that XMVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMVM | CSMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 5.43% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 12.70% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.97% | 22.51% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 21.57% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 23.92% | -1.11% |