PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSMIX vs. ARSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSMIX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSMIX achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly higher than ARSMX's 2.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CSMIX has outperformed ARSMX with an annualized return of 11.99%, while ARSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.82% annualized return.


CSMIX

1D
1.38%
1M
3.48%
YTD
15.08%
6M
13.85%
1Y
36.80%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
11.99%

ARSMX

1D
-0.41%
1M
1.99%
YTD
2.31%
6M
0.93%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSMIX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSMIX
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I
15.08%14.65%8.66%21.42%-8.87%28.95%7.82%21.01%-18.37%13.77%
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
2.31%-0.83%12.42%14.48%-8.62%23.41%1.71%34.82%-6.44%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CSMIX and ARSMX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2007

0.93

The correlation between CSMIX and ARSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSMIX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSMIX
CSMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CSMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSMX
ARSMX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ARSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSMIX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSMIXARSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.05

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

0.31

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

0.71

+10.39

CSMIX vs. ARSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the ARSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSMIX and ARSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSMIX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSMIX drawdown since its inception was -53.37%, roughly equal to the maximum ARSMX drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSMIX and ARSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSMIXARSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.37%

-51.75%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.94%

-10.37%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.98%

-19.34%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.98%

-19.34%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.42%

-42.96%

-5.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-5.36%

+3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-8.10%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

4.48%

-1.11%

Volatility

CSMIX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I (CSMIX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) at 3.05%. This indicates that CSMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSMIXARSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

3.05%

+1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

10.27%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.15%

14.45%

+3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.48%

17.76%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.94%

19.58%

+4.36%

CSMIX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSMIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSMIX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison

CSMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.36%, while ARSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%9.27%3.89%4.85%5.86%0.00%3.60%8.60%15.66%8.03%17.82%
CSMIX
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I
12.36%14.23%6.67%7.57%6.02%13.34%0.50%3.58%9.79%11.56%11.58%12.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSMIX and ARSMX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSMIX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to ARSMX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSMIX dropped -53.37% vs ARSMX's -51.75%.

CSMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSMIX and ARSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer