PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMPT vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMPT vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMPT achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, XMPT has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 1.94%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.


XMPT

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.78%
YTD
2.34%
6M
2.46%
1Y
11.93%
3Y*
7.25%
5Y*
-1.17%
10Y*
1.94%

MOAT

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.30%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
13.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMPT vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMPT
VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF
2.34%8.01%7.01%2.55%-24.02%7.94%7.70%20.36%-5.85%8.28%
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-0.94%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between XMPT and MOAT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.16

The correlation between XMPT and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.35 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMPT vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMPT
XMPT Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XMPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMPT Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XMPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMPT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMPT vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMPTMOATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

1.09

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

1.64

+0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.21

+0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.45

3.77

+3.68

XMPT vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMPT Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMPT and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMPTMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.09

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.44

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.72

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.77

-0.35

Drawdowns

XMPT vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMPT drawdown since its inception was -35.24%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMPT and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMPTMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.24%

-33.31%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-12.43%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.04%

-21.44%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.24%

-23.96%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.24%

-33.31%

-1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.94%

-4.72%

-4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

-3.83%

-4.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

3.98%

-2.38%

Volatility

XMPT vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) is 2.69%, while VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that XMPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMPTMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

3.82%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.03%

9.87%

-3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.21%

13.86%

-6.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.35%

18.18%

-8.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.36%

18.68%

-8.32%

XMPT vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMPT has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMPT vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

XMPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than MOAT's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.37%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
XMPT
VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF
6.34%5.87%5.35%3.81%5.12%3.74%3.79%4.08%5.05%4.84%5.35%5.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMPT and MOAT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to XMPT (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMPT dropped -35.24% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.37% vs 1.94% for XMPT. On fees, MOAT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, XMPT has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 1.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MOAT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 1.97% for XMPT.

XMPT has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 1.37% for MOAT.

XMPT is categorized as High Yield Muni, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. XMPT tracks S-Network Municipal Bond Closed-End Fund Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 1.97% for XMPT and 0.48% for MOAT.

XMPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMPT and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer