PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDSF vs. CAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDSF vs. CAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDSF achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than CAAA's 0.74% return.


LDSF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.93%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*

CAAA

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDSF vs. CAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LDSF and CAAA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2024

0.62

The correlation between LDSF and CAAA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDSF vs. CAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDSF
LDSF Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LDSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDSF Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LDSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CAAA
CAAA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDSF vs. CAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) and First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDSFCAAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.27

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

2.17

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

6.45

+4.37

LDSF vs. CAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDSF Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the CAAA Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDSF and CAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDSF vs. CAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDSF drawdown since its inception was -8.56%, which is greater than CAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDSF and CAAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDSFCAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-2.24%

-6.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.74%

-2.08%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.87%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-0.56%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.70%

-0.29%

Volatility

LDSF vs. CAAA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF (LDSF) is 0.67%, while First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA) has a volatility of 1.01%. This indicates that LDSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDSFCAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

1.01%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

2.25%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05%

3.10%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.09%

3.21%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.17%

3.21%

-0.04%

LDSF vs. CAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDSF has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than CAAA's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

LDSF vs. CAAA - Dividend Comparison

LDSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than CAAA's 5.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CAAA
First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF
5.29%6.09%4.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDSF
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF
4.63%4.52%4.53%4.08%2.61%1.97%2.65%3.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDSF and CAAA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAAA has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to LDSF (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDSF dropped -8.56% vs CAAA's -2.24%.

On 1-year performance, CAAA leads with 4.50% vs 4.46% for LDSF. On fees, CAAA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, LDSF has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CAAA has performed better with a 4.50% return vs 4.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAAA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for LDSF.

CAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.29%, compared with 4.63% for LDSF.

LDSF is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CAAA is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for LDSF and 0.55% for CAAA.

LDSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDSF and CAAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer