XMPT vs. HYMU
XMPT (VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF) and HYMU (BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. XMPT is passively managed, while HYMU is actively managed. XMPT charges 1.97%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HYMU.
Performance
XMPT vs. HYMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XMPT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 11.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.25%
- 5Y*
- -1.17%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
HYMU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMPT vs. HYMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | -0.31% |
HYMU BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMPT vs. HYMU — Risk / Return Rank
XMPT
HYMU
XMPT vs. HYMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMPT | HYMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.45 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMPT | HYMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | — | — |
Drawdowns
XMPT vs. HYMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMPT drawdown since its inception was -35.24%, which is greater than HYMU's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMPT and HYMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMPT | HYMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.24% | 0.00% | -35.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.94% | 0.00% | -8.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.82% | 0.00% | -8.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | — | — |
Volatility
XMPT vs. HYMU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMPT | HYMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.21% | 0.00% | +7.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.35% | 0.00% | +9.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 0.00% | +10.36% |
XMPT vs. HYMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMPT has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than HYMU's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMPT vs. HYMU - Dividend Comparison
XMPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, while HYMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMU BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | 6.34% | 5.87% | 5.35% | 3.81% | 5.12% | 3.74% | 3.79% | 4.08% | 5.05% | 4.84% | 5.35% | 5.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HYMU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYMU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.97% for XMPT.
XMPT has the higher dividend yield at 6.34%, compared with 0.00% for HYMU.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 1.97% for XMPT and 0.35% for HYMU.
Find the right allocation for XMPT and HYMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer