XMPT vs. CEFS
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS).
XMPT and CEFS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMPT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S-Network Municipal Bond Closed-End Fund Index. It was launched on Jul 12, 2011. CEFS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Mar 21, 2017.
Performance
XMPT vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMPT vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | -0.80% | 8.01% | 7.01% | 2.55% | -24.02% | 7.94% | 7.70% | 20.36% | -5.85% | 1.67% |
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | -0.33% | 16.67% | 23.48% | 20.99% | -7.08% | 17.86% | 3.40% | 28.41% | -9.97% | 7.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMPT achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's -0.33% return.
XMPT
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.99%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
CEFS
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 3.31%
- 1Y
- 14.56%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.58%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMPT vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMPT has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 3.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XMPT vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank
XMPT
CEFS
XMPT vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMPT | CEFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.11 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.90 | 1.54 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 1.43 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.76 | 6.94 | -4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMPT | CEFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.11 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | 0.90 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.70 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMPT and CEFS is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XMPT vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison
XMPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than CEFS's 8.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | 5.92% | 5.87% | 5.35% | 3.81% | 5.12% | 3.74% | 3.79% | 4.08% | 5.05% | 4.84% | 5.35% | 5.24% |
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 8.01% | 7.84% | 8.79% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 10.73% | 8.61% | 8.10% | 10.43% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XMPT vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMPT drawdown since its inception was -35.24%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMPT and CEFS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMPT | CEFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.24% | -38.99% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.64% | -9.80% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.24% | -16.85% | -18.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.73% | -3.75% | -7.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -3.73% | -5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.02% | +0.18% |
Volatility
XMPT vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) is 3.90%, while Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that XMPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMPT | CEFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 4.75% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.12% | 7.46% | -2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.46% | 13.15% | -4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 12.99% | -3.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.33% | 15.38% | -5.05% |