PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. XMVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 13.32% return, which is significantly lower than XMVM's 18.13% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 18.17%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.28% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
1.37%
1M
-4.13%
6M
10.87%
YTD
13.32%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
24.75%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
18.17%
ALL TIME*
12.18%

XMVM

1D
0.59%
1M
5.73%
6M
13.53%
YTD
18.13%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
12.28%
ALL TIME*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$60.28M$71.43M$67.26M
$2.19M$2.07M$1.98M

XMMO vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
13.32%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
18.13%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and XMVM is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between XMMO and XMVM has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XMMO vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
XMVM

Industrials

37.0%
11.7%

Technology

12.9%
5.1%

Basic Materials

10.2%
0.8%

Energy

8.4%
13.5%

Healthcare

8.1%
2.5%

Real Estate

7.2%
4.9%

Utilities

6.0%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
14.8%

Financial Services

2.9%
37.9%

Communication Services

1.7%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
1.2%

Industrials

XMMO
37.0%
XMVM
11.7%

Technology

XMMO
12.9%
XMVM
5.1%

Basic Materials

XMMO
10.2%
XMVM
0.8%

Energy

XMMO
8.4%
XMVM
13.5%

Healthcare

XMMO
8.1%
XMVM
2.5%

Real Estate

XMMO
7.2%
XMVM
4.9%

Utilities

XMMO
6.0%
XMVM
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
5.0%
XMVM
14.8%

Financial Services

XMMO
2.9%
XMVM
37.9%

Communication Services

XMMO
1.7%
XMVM
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
0.5%
XMVM
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XMMO vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMMOXMVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.48

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

4.28

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.64

13.71

-7.07

XMMO vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and XMVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOXMVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-62.83%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.91%

-9.18%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-24.12%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-24.12%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-45.07%

+8.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.02%

-0.12%

-9.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.42%

-10.19%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

2.86%

+0.49%

Volatility

XMMO vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.91% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.30%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOXMVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.91%

3.30%

+4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.48%

9.25%

+9.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

14.72%

+6.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.87%

21.24%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.44%

22.74%

-0.30%

XMMO vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than XMVM's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.62%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.78%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and XMVM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.91%) compared to XMVM (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 18.17% vs 12.28% for XMVM. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 18.17% return vs 12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.62% for XMMO.

XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and XMVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer