XMMO vs. XAR
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMMO returned 19.95%/yr vs 18.45%/yr for XAR. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XMMO vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly higher than XAR's 16.10% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed XAR with an annualized return of 19.95%, while XAR has yielded a comparatively lower 18.45% annualized return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- 1Y
- 37.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.62%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.95%
XAR
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 16.10%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 33.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
XMMO vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.77% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 16.10% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and XAR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XMMO and XAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMMO vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
XAR
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
XMMO
XAR
Technology
XMMO
XAR
Basic Materials
XMMO
XAR
-
Energy
XMMO
XAR
-
Healthcare
XMMO
XAR
-
Real Estate
XMMO
XAR
-
Utilities
XMMO
XAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
XAR
-
Financial Services
XMMO
XAR
-
Communication Services
XMMO
XAR
-
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
XAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
XAR
XMMO vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMMO | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.25 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 2.43 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.54 | 6.81 | +10.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than XAR's maximum drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -46.37% | -9.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -17.22% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -19.73% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -32.40% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | -46.37% | +9.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -4.32% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -6.78% | -2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 6.13% | -4.04% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is 9.07%, while SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a volatility of 11.46%. This indicates that XMMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 11.46% | -2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 23.56% | -6.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 27.85% | -8.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 23.66% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 24.74% | -2.39% |
XMMO vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XMMO and XAR have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XMMO vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than XAR's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and XAR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to XMMO (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs XAR's -46.37%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.95% vs 18.45% for XAR. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 9.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 18.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO and XAR have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while XAR is Aerospace & Defense. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer