XMMO vs. SCHD
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMMO returned 19.50%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for SCHD. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
XMMO vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XMMO having a 19.66% return and SCHD slightly lower at 18.71%. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 19.50%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.65% annualized return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 31.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 19.50%
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 19.28%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
XMMO vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 19.66% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 18.71% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and SCHD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XMMO and SCHD has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XMMO vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
SCHD
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
XMMO
SCHD
Technology
XMMO
SCHD
Energy
XMMO
SCHD
Basic Materials
XMMO
SCHD
Healthcare
XMMO
SCHD
Real Estate
XMMO
SCHD
-
Utilities
XMMO
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
SCHD
Financial Services
XMMO
SCHD
Communication Services
XMMO
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
SCHD
XMMO vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMMO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.43 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 5.74 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.23 | 14.06 | +1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMMO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 2.43 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.59 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.76 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.86 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -33.37% | -22.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -4.61% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -16.13% | -8.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -16.85% | -11.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | -33.37% | -3.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -1.64% | -2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -3.32% | -6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.88% | +0.19% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.83%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 2.83% | +4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.07% | 7.60% | +8.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 10.94% | +8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 14.38% | +7.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 16.72% | +5.59% |
XMMO vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.62% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and SCHD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.50% vs 12.65% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.62% for XMMO.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while SCHD is Dividend. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer