PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. MMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.96% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 10.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 19.66%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.13% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
2.16%
1M
6.07%
YTD
22.96%
6M
24.84%
1Y
37.37%
3Y*
31.83%
5Y*
16.81%
10Y*
19.66%

MMTM

1D
-0.41%
1M
3.02%
YTD
10.34%
6M
10.72%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
22.96%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
10.34%13.26%29.94%22.49%-16.12%26.33%19.27%29.98%-4.62%24.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and MMTM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2012

0.69

The correlation between XMMO and MMTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMMO vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
MMTM

Industrials

41.1%
7.6%

Technology

16.7%
29.5%

Energy

7.7%
1.7%

Basic Materials

7.2%
2.0%

Healthcare

6.3%
10.8%

Real Estate

6.1%
3.1%

Utilities

5.8%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
12.4%

Financial Services

2.4%
16.0%

Communication Services

1.6%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
6.7%

Industrials

XMMO
41.1%
MMTM
7.6%

Technology

XMMO
16.7%
MMTM
29.5%

Energy

XMMO
7.7%
MMTM
1.7%

Basic Materials

XMMO
7.2%
MMTM
2.0%

Healthcare

XMMO
6.3%
MMTM
10.8%

Real Estate

XMMO
6.1%
MMTM
3.1%

Utilities

XMMO
5.8%
MMTM
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
4.6%
MMTM
12.4%

Financial Services

XMMO
2.4%
MMTM
16.0%

Communication Services

XMMO
1.6%
MMTM
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
0.5%
MMTM
6.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MMTM
MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMMOMMTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

1.87

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.80

2.59

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

2.72

+1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.56

12.36

+6.20

XMMO vs. MMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the MMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and MMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMMOMMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.87

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.77

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.81

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.85

-0.28

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and MMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOMMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-33.85%

-21.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-9.89%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-22.08%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-23.72%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-33.85%

-2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.41%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-4.20%

-5.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.18%

-0.14%

Volatility

XMMO vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 2.10%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOMMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

2.10%

+5.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.59%

10.69%

+4.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.71%

14.14%

+4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.45%

18.20%

+3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.27%

18.65%

+3.62%

XMMO vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than MMTM's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMTM
SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF
0.78%0.86%0.83%1.16%1.67%0.95%1.14%1.55%1.64%1.52%1.98%1.68%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.61%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and MMTM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to MMTM (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs MMTM's -33.85%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.66% vs 15.13% for MMTM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.66% return vs 15.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

MMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.61% for XMMO.

XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.12% for MMTM.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and MMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer