XMMO vs. DXJ
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMMO returned 19.95%/yr vs 18.72%/yr for DXJ. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for DXJ.
Performance
XMMO vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly higher than DXJ's 18.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 19.95%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 18.72% annualized return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- 1Y
- 37.93%
- 3Y*
- 30.62%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.95%
DXJ
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 18.74%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 54.41%
- 3Y*
- 30.91%
- 5Y*
- 26.01%
- 10Y*
- 18.72%
XMMO vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.77% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 18.74% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and DXJ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XMMO and DXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMMO vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
DXJ
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
XMMO
DXJ
Technology
XMMO
DXJ
Basic Materials
XMMO
DXJ
Energy
XMMO
DXJ
Healthcare
XMMO
DXJ
Real Estate
XMMO
DXJ
-
Utilities
XMMO
DXJ
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
DXJ
Financial Services
XMMO
DXJ
Communication Services
XMMO
DXJ
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
DXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
DXJ
XMMO vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMMO | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.54 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 4.88 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.54 | 18.93 | -1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than DXJ's maximum drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and DXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -49.63% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -10.98% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -22.19% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -22.19% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | -39.14% | +2.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -1.34% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -14.32% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 2.83% | -0.74% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 4.64%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 4.64% | +4.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 13.56% | +3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 17.73% | +2.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 19.02% | +2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 20.17% | +2.18% |
XMMO vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than DXJ's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 1.09% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and DXJ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to DXJ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs DXJ's -49.63%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.95% vs 18.72% for DXJ. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 18.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.61% for XMMO.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while DXJ is Japan Equities. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and DXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer