PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMME.DE vs. XESC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMME.DE vs. XESC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMME.DE achieves a 30.06% return, which is significantly higher than XESC.DE's 7.20% return.


XMME.DE

1D
-1.04%
1M
7.79%
YTD
30.06%
6M
31.13%
1Y
51.93%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*

XESC.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
4.61%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.63%
1Y
15.79%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMME.DE vs. XESC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMME.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
30.06%18.69%13.82%5.89%-15.00%4.75%6.57%21.91%-11.16%7.23%
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
7.20%22.24%11.06%22.50%-8.87%23.54%-2.88%30.09%-12.09%-0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XMME.DE and XESC.DE is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017

0.64

The correlation between XMME.DE and XESC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMME.DE vs. XESC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMME.DE
XMME.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMME.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

XESC.DE
XESC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMME.DE vs. XESC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMME.DEXESC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.18

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.98

1.45

+3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.04

4.94

+13.11

XMME.DE vs. XESC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMME.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the XESC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMME.DE and XESC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMME.DEXESC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00

0.98

+2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.65

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.32

+0.12

Drawdowns

XMME.DE vs. XESC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMME.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.96%, smaller than the maximum XESC.DE drawdown of -45.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMME.DE and XESC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMME.DEXESC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.96%

-45.38%

+13.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-10.88%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-16.53%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.38%

-23.33%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.53%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.53%

-8.39%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.19%

-0.24%

Volatility

XMME.DE vs. XESC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.DE) at 4.90%. This indicates that XMME.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XESC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMME.DEXESC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

4.90%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

13.02%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

16.01%

+1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

17.54%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

18.27%

+0.34%

XMME.DE vs. XESC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMME.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XESC.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XMME.DE vs. XESC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMME.DE nor XESC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XESC.DE
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.19%
XMME.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMME.DE and XESC.DE have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XESC.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XESC.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XMME.DE.

XMME.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while XESC.DE is Europe Equities. XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while XESC.DE tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XMME.DE and 0.09% for XESC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMME.DE and XESC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer