XMME.DE vs. IB01.L
XMME.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) and IB01.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XMME.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, while IB01.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMME.DE returned 8.16%/yr vs 4.17%/yr for IB01.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. XMME.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IB01.L.
Performance
XMME.DE vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XMME.DE is traded in EUR, while IB01.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IB01.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMME.DE achieves a 26.82% return, which is significantly higher than IB01.L's 3.09% return.
XMME.DE
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 26.82%
- 6M
- 28.91%
- 1Y
- 47.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- —
IB01.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 2.31%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- —
XMME.DE vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMME.DE Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 26.82% | 18.69% | 13.82% | 5.89% | -15.00% | 4.75% | 6.58% | 11.55% |
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 3.09% | -8.05% | 12.19% | 1.78% | 7.34% | 6.56% | -7.43% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMME.DE and IB01.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMME.DE vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMME.DE
IB01.L
XMME.DE vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMME.DE | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.12 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 1.08 | +3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.86 | 2.61 | +12.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMME.DE vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMME.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.95%, which is greater than IB01.L's maximum drawdown of -13.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMME.DE and IB01.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMME.DE | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.95% | -13.53% | -18.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -3.83% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | -11.53% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.39% | -11.76% | -12.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -6.34% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.81% | -5.99% | -3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 1.58% | +1.51% |
Volatility
XMME.DE vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMME.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) at 1.30%. This indicates that XMME.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMME.DE | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 1.30% | +6.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.90% | 4.31% | +11.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.50% | 6.21% | +12.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 7.59% | +9.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 7.37% | +11.55% |
XMME.DE vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMME.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IB01.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMME.DE vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMME.DE nor IB01.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMME.DE and IB01.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IB01.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB01.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XMME.DE.
XMME.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IB01.L is Government Bonds. XMME.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XMME.DE and 0.07% for IB01.L.
Find the right allocation for XMME.DE and IB01.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer