XMLV vs. TAIL
XMLV (Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF) and TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. XMLV is passively managed, while TAIL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMLV returned 5.52%/yr vs -8.38%/yr for TAIL. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. XMLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TAIL.
Performance
XMLV vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMLV achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -6.17% return.
XMLV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
TAIL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- -8.73%
- 3Y*
- -5.76%
- 5Y*
- -8.38%
- 10Y*
- —
XMLV vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | 2.54% | 5.55% | 17.08% | 1.86% | -6.55% | 23.00% | -8.42% | 23.77% | -0.16% | 5.03% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | -6.17% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -13.29% | -13.13% | -12.81% | 6.91% | -14.27% | 2.85% | -7.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLV and TAIL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | -0.46 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between XMLV and TAIL has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.46 to -0.13, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
XMLV vs. TAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMLV
TAIL
Real Estate
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
XMLV
TAIL
Financial Services
XMLV
TAIL
Utilities
XMLV
TAIL
Industrials
XMLV
TAIL
Consumer Defensive
XMLV
TAIL
Energy
XMLV
TAIL
Consumer Cyclical
XMLV
TAIL
Healthcare
XMLV
TAIL
Basic Materials
XMLV
TAIL
Communication Services
XMLV
TAIL
Technology
XMLV
TAIL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMLV vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank
XMLV
TAIL
XMLV vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMLV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.83 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | -0.80 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | -2.01 | +4.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMLV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | -1.03 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | -0.57 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | -0.48 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
XMLV vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLV drawdown since its inception was -39.86%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLV and TAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMLV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.86% | -52.36% | +12.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.03% | -10.95% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -20.65% | +6.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.53% | -38.44% | +21.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.89% | -51.56% | +46.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -29.12% | +24.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 4.35% | -2.26% |
Volatility
XMLV vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 0.86%. This indicates that XMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMLV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 0.86% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 6.45% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.35% | 8.51% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 14.90% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 14.94% | +2.03% |
XMLV vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMLV vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison
XMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than TAIL's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 3.49% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | 2.91% | 2.87% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.05% | 1.14% | 1.93% | 2.02% | 2.13% | 1.74% | 1.72% | 1.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMLV and TAIL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMLV has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMLV dropped -39.86% vs TAIL's -52.36%.
On 5-year performance, XMLV leads with 5.52% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, XMLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XMLV has performed better with a 5.52% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TAIL.
TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.91% for XMLV.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XMLV and 0.59% for TAIL.
XMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMLV and TAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer