XMLV vs. EJAN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMLV (Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF) and EJAN (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - XMLV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index while EJAN tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMLV returned 5.52%/yr vs 2.91%/yr for EJAN. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EJAN.

Performance

XMLV vs. EJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMLV achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly lower than EJAN's 6.45% return.

XMLV

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -2.36%
• YTD: 2.54%
• 6M: 2.22%
• 1Y: 5.54%
• 3Y*: 10.18%
• 5Y*: 5.52%
• 10Y*: 7.60%

EJAN

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 7.11%
• 1Y: 15.77%
• 3Y*: 8.49%
• 5Y*: 2.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMLV vs. EJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF	2.54%	5.55%	17.08%	1.86%	-6.55%	23.00%	-7.61%
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	6.45%	14.78%	2.69%	5.37%	-8.01%	-1.53%	10.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XMLV and EJAN is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020	0.44

The correlation between XMLV and EJAN shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMLV vs. EJAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMLV	EJAN
Real Estate	30.8%	1.1%
Financial Services	21.6%	19.4%
Utilities	20.0%	2.1%
Industrials	9.7%	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	3.0%
Energy	3.9%	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	3.3%	9.6%
Healthcare	2.9%	2.9%
Basic Materials	2.1%	6.5%
Communication Services	1.0%	6.9%
Technology	1.0%	37.0%

Return for Risk

XMLV vs. EJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMLV

XMLV Risk / Return Rank: 18
XMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
XMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 15
XMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
XMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 21

EJAN

EJAN Risk / Return Rank: 63
EJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
EJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMLV vs. EJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMLV	EJAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	2.00	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	2.91	-2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.47	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	2.39	-1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.66	11.15	-8.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMLV vs. EJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the EJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLV and EJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMLV	EJAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54	2.00	-1.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	0.26	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.35	+0.24

Drawdowns

XMLV vs. EJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLV drawdown since its inception was -39.86%, which is greater than EJAN's maximum drawdown of -22.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLV and EJAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMLV	EJAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.86%	-22.23%	-17.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.03%	-6.63%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.80%	-11.75%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.53%	-22.00%	+5.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.89%	-0.39%	-4.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-5.78%	+1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	1.42%	+0.67%

Volatility

XMLV vs. EJAN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) at 2.14%. This indicates that XMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMLV	EJAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	2.14%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.34%	7.29%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.35%	7.92%	+2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.46%	11.11%	+3.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	12.68%	+4.29%

XMLV vs. EJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EJAN's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMLV vs. EJAN - Dividend Comparison

XMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, while EJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF	2.91%	2.87%	2.23%	2.34%	2.05%	1.14%	1.93%	2.02%	2.13%	1.74%	1.72%	1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMLV and EJAN in my portfolio?

XMLV and EJAN have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMLV or EJAN?

XMLV has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to EJAN (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMLV dropped -39.86% vs EJAN's -22.23%.

Which ETF is better, XMLV or EJAN?

On 5-year performance, XMLV leads with 5.52% vs 2.91% for EJAN. On fees, XMLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EJAN has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMLV or EJAN?

Over the 5-year period, XMLV has performed better with a 5.52% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMLV or EJAN?

XMLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMLV or EJAN?

XMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.00% for EJAN.

What is the main difference between XMLV and EJAN?

XMLV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index, while EJAN tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XMLV and 0.89% for EJAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.