PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMLA.L achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than XCX5.L's -12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XMLA.L has underperformed XCX5.L with an annualized return of 5.80%, while XCX5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.44% annualized return.


XMLA.L

1D
-0.93%
1M
-6.39%
YTD
9.07%
6M
6.79%
1Y
28.84%
3Y*
7.96%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
5.80%

XCX5.L

1D
1.26%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-12.70%
6M
-12.76%
1Y
-12.07%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
7.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMLA.L
Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C
9.07%47.26%-28.14%19.29%15.56%-17.92%-16.50%12.08%-1.16%11.16%
XCX5.L
Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C
-12.70%-5.16%11.92%12.56%2.33%26.19%9.49%2.58%-3.56%24.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XMLA.L and XCX5.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010

0.40

The correlation between XMLA.L and XCX5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMLA.L
XCX5.L

Technology

19.6%
8.2%

Industrials

17.7%
10.2%

Financial Services

15.6%
28.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.7%
12.4%

Real Estate

12.5%
1.3%

Communication Services

9.9%
4.7%

Basic Materials

7.4%
8.5%

Healthcare

3.7%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.2%

Energy

-

9.5%

Utilities

-

4.5%

Technology

XMLA.L
19.6%
XCX5.L
8.2%

Industrials

XMLA.L
17.7%
XCX5.L
10.2%

Financial Services

XMLA.L
15.6%
XCX5.L
28.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XMLA.L
13.7%
XCX5.L
12.4%

Real Estate

XMLA.L
12.5%
XCX5.L
1.3%

Communication Services

XMLA.L
9.9%
XCX5.L
4.7%

Basic Materials

XMLA.L
7.4%
XCX5.L
8.5%

Healthcare

XMLA.L
3.7%
XCX5.L
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

XMLA.L

-

XCX5.L
6.2%

Energy

XMLA.L

-

XCX5.L
9.5%

Utilities

XMLA.L

-

XCX5.L
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMLA.L
XMLA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XMLA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMLA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMLA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
XMLA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMLA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

XCX5.L
XCX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XCX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XCX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMLA.LXCX5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.89

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

-0.60

+3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.49

-1.37

+8.86

XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the XCX5.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLA.L and XCX5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMLA.LXCX5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

-0.76

+2.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.26

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.37

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.23

-0.14

Drawdowns

XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLA.L drawdown since its inception was -59.62%, which is greater than XCX5.L's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLA.L and XCX5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMLA.LXCX5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.62%

-41.74%

-17.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-19.88%

+8.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.38%

-26.47%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.25%

-26.47%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.07%

-37.35%

-11.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.18%

-23.06%

+11.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.16%

-11.04%

-14.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

8.81%

-4.97%

Volatility

XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) is 5.10%, while Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that XMLA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMLA.LXCX5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

6.39%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.23%

13.26%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.00%

15.78%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.25%

15.92%

+5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.10%

19.89%

+5.21%

XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMLA.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMLA.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMLA.L and XCX5.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMLA.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMLA.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.

XMLA.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while XCX5.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XMLA.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XMLA.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMLA.L and XCX5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer