XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L
XMLA.L (Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and XCX5.L (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XMLA.L is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while XCX5.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMLA.L returned 5.80%/yr vs 7.44%/yr for XCX5.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMLA.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for XCX5.L.
Performance
XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMLA.L achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than XCX5.L's -12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XMLA.L has underperformed XCX5.L with an annualized return of 5.80%, while XCX5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.44% annualized return.
XMLA.L
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 6.79%
- 1Y
- 28.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.63%
- 10Y*
- 5.80%
XCX5.L
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -12.70%
- 6M
- -12.76%
- 1Y
- -12.07%
- 3Y*
- 2.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 7.44%
XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLA.L Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 9.07% | 47.26% | -28.14% | 19.29% | 15.56% | -17.92% | -16.50% | 12.08% | -1.16% | 11.16% |
XCX5.L Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -12.70% | -5.16% | 11.92% | 12.56% | 2.33% | 26.19% | 9.49% | 2.58% | -3.56% | 24.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLA.L and XCX5.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010 | 0.40 |
The correlation between XMLA.L and XCX5.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMLA.L
XCX5.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XMLA.L
XCX5.L
Industrials
XMLA.L
XCX5.L
Financial Services
XMLA.L
XCX5.L
Consumer Cyclical
XMLA.L
XCX5.L
Real Estate
XMLA.L
XCX5.L
Communication Services
XMLA.L
XCX5.L
Basic Materials
XMLA.L
XCX5.L
Healthcare
XMLA.L
XCX5.L
Consumer Defensive
XMLA.L
-
XCX5.L
Energy
XMLA.L
-
XCX5.L
Utilities
XMLA.L
-
XCX5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMLA.L
XCX5.L
XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMLA.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.89 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | -0.60 | +3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | -1.37 | +8.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMLA.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | -0.76 | +2.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.26 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.37 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.23 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLA.L drawdown since its inception was -59.62%, which is greater than XCX5.L's maximum drawdown of -41.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLA.L and XCX5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMLA.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.62% | -41.74% | -17.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -19.88% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.38% | -26.47% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.25% | -26.47% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.07% | -37.35% | -11.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.18% | -23.06% | +11.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.16% | -11.04% | -14.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.84% | 8.81% | -4.97% |
Volatility
XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) is 5.10%, while Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCX5.L) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that XMLA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMLA.L | XCX5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 6.39% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.23% | 13.26% | +1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.00% | 15.78% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 15.92% | +5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.10% | 19.89% | +5.21% |
XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLA.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMLA.L vs. XCX5.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMLA.L nor XCX5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XMLA.L and XCX5.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMLA.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMLA.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCX5.L.
XMLA.L is categorized as Latin America Equities, while XCX5.L is Asia Pacific Equities. XMLA.L tracks MSCI EM Latin America NR USD, while XCX5.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XMLA.L and 0.75% for XCX5.L.
Find the right allocation for XMLA.L and XCX5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer