PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMLA.L vs. ALAU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XMLA.L vs. ALAU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XMLA.L vs. ALAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMLA.L
Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C
17.05%47.26%-28.14%19.29%15.56%-17.92%-16.50%12.08%-1.16%11.16%
ALAU.L
Amundi MSCI Em Latin America
18.66%43.92%-25.14%23.53%25.23%-8.25%-13.06%7.92%-2.80%14.98%
Different Trading Currencies

XMLA.L is traded in GBp, while ALAU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ALAU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMLA.L achieves a 17.05% return, which is significantly lower than ALAU.L's 18.66% return. Over the past 10 years, XMLA.L has underperformed ALAU.L with an annualized return of 6.26%, while ALAU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.78% annualized return.


XMLA.L

1D
3.09%
1M
0.66%
YTD
17.05%
6M
26.41%
1Y
53.45%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
6.26%

ALAU.L

1D
2.91%
1M
0.55%
YTD
18.66%
6M
30.15%
1Y
54.53%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
14.54%
10Y*
9.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XMLA.L vs. ALAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMLA.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ALAU.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XMLA.L vs. ALAU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMLA.L
XMLA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
XMLA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMLA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMLA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XMLA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMLA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ALAU.L
ALAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ALAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMLA.L vs. ALAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMLA.LALAU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.79

2.77

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.55

3.46

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.47

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.71

4.75

+0.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.43

16.71

+0.72

XMLA.L vs. ALAU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the ALAU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLA.L and ALAU.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMLA.LALAU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

2.77

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.97

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.63

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.65

-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between XMLA.L and ALAU.L is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XMLA.L vs. ALAU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMLA.L nor ALAU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XMLA.L vs. ALAU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLA.L drawdown since its inception was -59.62%, which is greater than ALAU.L's maximum drawdown of -48.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLA.L and ALAU.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XMLA.LALAU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.62%

-51.94%

-7.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.37%

-11.71%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.25%

-27.25%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.07%

-51.94%

+2.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-3.92%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.36%

-11.81%

-13.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

3.60%

-0.53%

Volatility

XMLA.L vs. ALAU.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) and Amundi MSCI Em Latin America (ALAU.L) have volatilities of 8.47% and 8.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XMLA.LALAU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.47%

8.57%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

15.45%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.10%

20.03%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.20%

28.60%

-7.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.22%

43.76%

-18.54%