XMLA.L vs. FVUB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L).
XMLA.L and FVUB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMLA.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM Latin America NR USD. It was launched on Jun 22, 2007. FVUB.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI Brazil NR USD. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. Both XMLA.L and FVUB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XMLA.L vs. FVUB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMLA.L vs. FVUB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLA.L Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 17.05% | 47.26% | -28.14% | 19.29% | 15.56% | -17.92% | -16.50% | 3.63% |
FVUB.L Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF | 24.97% | 35.51% | -26.77% | 26.33% | 23.83% | -15.44% | -22.19% | -14.94% |
Different Trading Currencies
XMLA.L is traded in GBp, while FVUB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FVUB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMLA.L achieves a 17.05% return, which is significantly lower than FVUB.L's 24.97% return.
XMLA.L
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 17.05%
- 6M
- 26.41%
- 1Y
- 53.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 6.26%
FVUB.L
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 24.97%
- 6M
- 34.00%
- 1Y
- 48.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMLA.L vs. FVUB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLA.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FVUB.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XMLA.L vs. FVUB.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMLA.L
FVUB.L
XMLA.L vs. FVUB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMLA.L | FVUB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.79 | 2.13 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.55 | 2.77 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.37 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.71 | 4.81 | +0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.43 | 13.75 | +3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMLA.L | FVUB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 2.13 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.52 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.04 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLA.L and FVUB.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XMLA.L vs. FVUB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMLA.L nor FVUB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XMLA.L vs. FVUB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLA.L drawdown since its inception was -59.62%, roughly equal to the maximum FVUB.L drawdown of -58.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLA.L and FVUB.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMLA.L | FVUB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.62% | -58.22% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.37% | -10.41% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.25% | -29.42% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | 0.00% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.36% | -28.32% | +2.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 3.64% | -0.57% |
Volatility
XMLA.L vs. FVUB.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EM Latin America ESG Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMLA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.47% compared to Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FVUB.L) at 7.99%. This indicates that XMLA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVUB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMLA.L | FVUB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.47% | 7.99% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.39% | 17.49% | -3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.10% | 22.83% | -3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 25.56% | -4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 31.61% | -6.39% |