XMID.L vs. XCX6.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XMID.L (Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and XCX6.L (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XMID.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Indonesia NR IDR, while XCX6.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMID.L returned -3.59%/yr vs 5.39%/yr for XCX6.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

XMID.L vs. XCX6.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMID.L) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMID.L achieves a -39.40% return, which is significantly lower than XCX6.L's -7.52% return. Over the past 10 years, XMID.L has underperformed XCX6.L with an annualized return of -3.59%, while XCX6.L has yielded a comparatively higher 5.39% annualized return.

XMID.L

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: -19.47%
• YTD: -39.40%
• 6M: -40.52%
• 1Y: -39.13%
• 3Y*: -23.13%
• 5Y*: -9.05%
• 10Y*: -3.59%

XCX6.L

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: -7.52%
• 6M: -9.53%
• 1Y: 5.17%
• 3Y*: 7.33%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: 5.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMID.L vs. XCX6.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMID.L Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C	-39.40%	-8.44%	-12.66%	-0.27%	14.84%	1.39%	-10.64%	3.73%	-4.01%	12.41%
XCX6.L Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C	-7.52%	22.42%	20.57%	-17.10%	-13.36%	-21.25%	25.03%	17.56%	-14.28%	40.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XMID.L and XCX6.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010	0.40

The correlation between XMID.L and XCX6.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMID.L vs. XCX6.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMID.L	XCX6.L
Financial Services	51.0%	19.1%
Basic Materials	17.2%	5.5%
Communication Services	9.5%	18.8%
Industrials	8.3%	5.0%
Energy	4.6%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	3.2%
Technology	3.3%	9.6%
Utilities	2.4%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	26.5%
Healthcare	-	5.4%
Real Estate	-	1.5%

Return for Risk

XMID.L vs. XCX6.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMID.L

XMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 0
XMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
XMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
XMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 0
XMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
XMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 0

XCX6.L

XCX6.L Risk / Return Rank: 13
XCX6.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
XCX6.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
XCX6.L Omega Ratio Rank: 13
XCX6.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
XCX6.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMID.L vs. XCX6.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMID.L) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMID.L	XCX6.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.59	0.28	-1.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.39	0.52	-2.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.71	1.06	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	0.29	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-2.56	0.62	-3.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMID.L vs. XCX6.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMID.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.59, which is lower than the XCX6.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMID.L and XCX6.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMID.L	XCX6.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.59	0.28	-1.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.45	-0.16	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.15	0.21	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	0.15	-0.27

Drawdowns

XMID.L vs. XCX6.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMID.L drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, roughly equal to the maximum XCX6.L drawdown of -57.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMID.L and XCX6.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMID.L	XCX6.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.27%	-57.08%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.58%	-17.48%	-25.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.16%	-24.89%	-29.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.27%	-49.99%	-8.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.27%	-57.08%	-1.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.27%	-34.10%	-24.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.97%	-20.91%	+2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.24%	8.35%	+6.89%

Volatility

XMID.L vs. XCX6.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMID.L) is 6.26%, while Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that XMID.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX6.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMID.L	XCX6.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.26%	7.09%	-0.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.74%	13.08%	+6.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.49%	18.39%	+6.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.06%	27.71%	-7.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.32%	25.27%	-1.95%

XMID.L vs. XCX6.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XMID.L and XCX6.L have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

XMID.L vs. XCX6.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMID.L nor XCX6.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMID.L and XCX6.L in my portfolio?

XMID.L and XCX6.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMID.L or XCX6.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMID.L or XCX6.L?

XMID.L and XCX6.L have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

What is the main difference between XMID.L and XCX6.L?

XMID.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XCX6.L is China Equities. XMID.L tracks MSCI Indonesia NR IDR, while XCX6.L tracks MSCI China NR USD.