XCX6.L vs. FXC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS (FXC.L).
XCX6.L and FXC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCX6.L is a passively managed fund by DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 24, 2010. FXC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2004. Both XCX6.L and FXC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XCX6.L or FXC.L.
Correlation
The correlation between XCX6.L and FXC.L is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XCX6.L vs. FXC.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XCX6.L:
0.50
FXC.L:
0.81
XCX6.L:
0.87
FXC.L:
1.21
XCX6.L:
1.11
FXC.L:
1.16
XCX6.L:
0.26
FXC.L:
0.48
XCX6.L:
1.20
FXC.L:
2.03
XCX6.L:
11.48%
FXC.L:
10.70%
XCX6.L:
29.07%
FXC.L:
29.24%
XCX6.L:
-57.08%
FXC.L:
-60.51%
XCX6.L:
-37.75%
FXC.L:
-24.79%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCX6.L achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly lower than FXC.L's 7.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XCX6.L has outperformed FXC.L with an annualized return of 2.21%, while FXC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.45% annualized return.
XCX6.L
6.94%
10.46%
6.76%
14.48%
-1.79%
2.21%
FXC.L
7.99%
10.63%
9.42%
23.65%
-0.39%
1.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCX6.L vs. FXC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCX6.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FXC.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XCX6.L vs. FXC.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XCX6.L
FXC.L
XCX6.L vs. FXC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS (FXC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XCX6.L vs. FXC.L - Dividend Comparison
XCX6.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCX6.L Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXC.L iShares China Large Cap UCITS | 3.21% | 2.99% | 3.10% | 2.85% | 2.51% | 3.26% | 3.22% | 3.89% | 3.18% | 3.04% | 4.00% | 3.94% |
Drawdowns
XCX6.L vs. FXC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCX6.L drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, smaller than the maximum FXC.L drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX6.L and FXC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XCX6.L vs. FXC.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS (FXC.L) have volatilities of 7.90% and 7.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.