XCX6.L vs. IUIT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L).
XCX6.L and IUIT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCX6.L is a passively managed fund by DWS Investment S.A. (ETF) that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jun 24, 2010. IUIT.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both XCX6.L and IUIT.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XCX6.L or IUIT.L.
Key characteristics
| XCX6.L | IUIT.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -0.42% | 25.66% |
| 1Y Return | -8.64% | 42.92% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -12.28% | 16.81% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -6.08% | 25.01% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.39 | 2.10 |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.46% | 20.72% |
| Max Drawdown | -57.08% | -33.46% |
| Current Drawdown | -51.92% | -6.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCX6.L and IUIT.L is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XCX6.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XCX6.L achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 25.66% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCX6.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCX6.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XCX6.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XCX6.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCX6.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XCX6.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCX6.L drawdown since its inception was -57.08%, which is greater than IUIT.L's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCX6.L and IUIT.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XCX6.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCX6.L) is 5.37%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that XCX6.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.