XMID.L vs. FLRK.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMID.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L).
XMID.L and FLRK.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMID.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the MSCI Indonesia NR IDR. It was launched on Mar 2, 2010. FLRK.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI Korea NR USD. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. Both XMID.L and FLRK.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XMID.L vs. FLRK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMID.L vs. FLRK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMID.L Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -17.99% | -8.44% | -12.66% | -0.27% | 14.84% | 1.39% | -10.64% | 1.97% |
FLRK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 33.25% | 82.09% | -20.56% | 14.16% | -19.37% | -5.90% | 42.60% | -14.15% |
Different Trading Currencies
XMID.L is traded in GBp, while FLRK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLRK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMID.L achieves a -17.99% return, which is significantly lower than FLRK.L's 33.25% return.
XMID.L
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -9.28%
- YTD
- -17.99%
- 6M
- -13.12%
- 1Y
- -13.06%
- 3Y*
- -14.09%
- 5Y*
- -3.24%
- 10Y*
- -0.93%
FLRK.L
- 1D
- 9.23%
- 1M
- -10.91%
- YTD
- 33.25%
- 6M
- 64.38%
- 1Y
- 132.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMID.L vs. FLRK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMID.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRK.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XMID.L vs. FLRK.L — Risk / Return Rank
XMID.L
FLRK.L
XMID.L vs. FLRK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMID.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMID.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | 4.25 | -4.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | 4.56 | -5.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.65 | -0.73 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 6.31 | -6.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 24.10 | -25.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMID.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 4.25 | -4.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.44 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.42 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMID.L and FLRK.L is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XMID.L vs. FLRK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XMID.L nor FLRK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XMID.L vs. FLRK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMID.L drawdown since its inception was -49.56%, which is greater than FLRK.L's maximum drawdown of -41.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMID.L and FLRK.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMID.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.56% | -41.57% | -7.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.21% | -21.18% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.65% | -38.88% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.53% | -13.91% | -29.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.64% | -20.35% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.81% | 5.55% | +3.26% |
Volatility
XMID.L vs. FLRK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Indonesia Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XMID.L) is 8.25%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a volatility of 16.59%. This indicates that XMID.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMID.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 16.59% | -8.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.04% | 27.15% | -8.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.85% | 31.15% | -7.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.68% | 23.21% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.13% | 26.13% | -3.00% |