XMHQ vs. SOXQ
XMHQ (Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMHQ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XMHQ returned 16.56%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMHQ charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
XMHQ vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMHQ achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
XMHQ
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 14.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMHQ vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 9.49% | 4.71% | 16.79% | 29.51% | -12.42% | 3.41% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMHQ and SOXQ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XMHQ and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMHQ vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMHQ
SOXQ
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
XMHQ
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
XMHQ
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
XMHQ
SOXQ
Technology
XMHQ
SOXQ
Consumer Cyclical
XMHQ
SOXQ
-
Energy
XMHQ
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
XMHQ
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
XMHQ
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
XMHQ
SOXQ
-
Utilities
XMHQ
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
XMHQ
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMHQ vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
XMHQ
SOXQ
XMHQ vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMHQ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.72 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 11.73 | -10.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | 45.01 | -40.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMHQ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 5.43 | -4.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.98 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
XMHQ vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMHQ drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMHQ and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMHQ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -46.01% | -12.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -15.59% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | -39.36% | +14.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.29% | -12.96% | +3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 4.06% | -1.04% |
Volatility
XMHQ vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) is 4.67%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that XMHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMHQ | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 13.44% | -8.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.09% | 26.70% | -15.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 33.78% | -18.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.74% | 36.38% | -15.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 36.38% | -15.67% |
XMHQ vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMHQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMHQ vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
XMHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.55% | 0.64% | 5.20% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMHQ and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to XMHQ (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMHQ dropped -58.19% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 16.56% for XMHQ. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, XMHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 16.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XMHQ.
XMHQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
XMHQ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. XMHQ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XMHQ and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMHQ and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer