XMHQ vs. BMVP
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP).
XMHQ and BMVP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006. BMVP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MVP Index. It was launched on May 1, 2003. Both XMHQ and BMVP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XMHQ vs. BMVP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMHQ vs. BMVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 2.09% | 4.71% | 16.79% | 29.51% | -12.42% | 20.98% | 26.61% | 27.18% | -9.08% | 15.64% |
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 2.87% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | -16.01% | 19.38% | 8.52% | 13.47% | -6.40% | 20.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMHQ achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than BMVP's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XMHQ has outperformed BMVP with an annualized return of 12.53%, while BMVP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.18% annualized return.
XMHQ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 13.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
BMVP
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMHQ vs. BMVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMHQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BMVP's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XMHQ vs. BMVP — Risk / Return Rank
XMHQ
BMVP
XMHQ vs. BMVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMHQ | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.48 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 0.77 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.11 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 0.60 | +0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 2.73 | +1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMHQ | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.48 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.41 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.49 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.11 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMHQ and BMVP is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XMHQ vs. BMVP - Dividend Comparison
XMHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than BMVP's 1.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.59% | 0.64% | 5.20% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% |
BMVP Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF | 1.73% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
XMHQ vs. BMVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMHQ drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, smaller than the maximum BMVP drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMHQ and BMVP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMHQ | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -78.13% | +19.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -11.26% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -26.58% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.90% | -39.45% | +2.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -5.11% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -36.46% | +27.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 2.47% | +0.97% |
Volatility
XMHQ vs. BMVP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) at 3.09%. This indicates that XMHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMHQ | BMVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 3.09% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 7.37% | +4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.29% | 14.24% | +6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 16.28% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.69% | 18.84% | +1.85% |