XME vs. UFO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while UFO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S-Network Space Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XME returned 21.78%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for UFO. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UFO.

Performance

XME vs. UFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 36.92% return.

XME

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 16.32%
• 6M: 18.13%
• 1Y: 85.07%
• 3Y*: 35.23%
• 5Y*: 21.78%
• 10Y*: 19.60%

UFO

• 1D: -6.99%
• 1M: -8.71%
• YTD: 36.92%
• 6M: 37.68%
• 1Y: 105.58%
• 3Y*: 41.51%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XME vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	16.32%	83.47%	-4.54%	21.51%	13.13%	34.92%	15.95%	-1.31%
UFO Procure Space ETF	36.92%	67.36%	27.22%	-2.34%	-25.85%	7.17%	-2.15%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and UFO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019	0.59

The correlation between XME and UFO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

XME vs. UFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XME	UFO
Basic Materials	74.9%	-
Energy	23.8%	-
Technology	2.2%	27.8%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-
Industrials	0.4%	45.8%
Communication Services	-	24.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XME vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME

XME Risk / Return Rank: 75
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 73
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 61

UFO

UFO Risk / Return Rank: 83
UFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
UFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
UFO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
UFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UFO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XME vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XME	UFO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.58	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.06	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.37	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	4.58	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.58	14.05	-4.47

XME vs. UFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the UFO Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and UFO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XME vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than UFO's maximum drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and UFO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XME	UFO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.89%	-50.33%	-35.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.60%	-22.94%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.47%	-25.91%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.27%	-50.33%	+13.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.33%	-21.95%	+12.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.09%	-21.80%	-22.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.05%	7.46%	+1.59%

Volatility

XME vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is 15.26%, while Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a volatility of 20.43%. This indicates that XME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XME	UFO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.26%	20.43%	-5.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.51%	34.11%	-5.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.11%	40.69%	-4.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.84%	30.59%	+2.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.96%	31.16%	+1.80%

XME vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XME vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than UFO's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UFO Procure Space ETF	0.31%	0.46%	1.98%	1.90%	3.19%	1.00%	1.07%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	0.32%	0.38%	0.65%	1.00%	1.64%	0.70%	0.99%	2.43%	2.23%	1.15%	1.02%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XME and UFO in my portfolio?

XME and UFO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XME or UFO?

UFO has higher volatility (20.43%) compared to XME (15.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs UFO's -50.33%.

Which ETF is better, XME or UFO?

On 5-year performance, XME leads with 21.78% vs 13.50% for UFO. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XME has been the lower-risk option at 15.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XME or UFO?

Over the 5-year period, XME has performed better with a 21.78% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XME or UFO?

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XME or UFO?

XME has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.31% for UFO.

What is the main difference between XME and UFO?

XME is categorized as Materials, while UFO is Global Equities. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while UFO tracks S-Network Space Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.75% for UFO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.