XME vs. INDA
XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and INDA (iShares MSCI India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while INDA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XME returned 19.60%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for INDA. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for INDA.
Performance
XME vs. INDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than INDA's -10.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed INDA with an annualized return of 19.60%, while INDA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.09% annualized return.
XME
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 86.41%
- 3Y*
- 35.23%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
INDA
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- -10.58%
- 6M
- -9.05%
- 1Y
- -11.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
XME vs. INDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 16.32% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | -10.58% | 2.68% | 8.63% | 17.16% | -8.94% | 21.36% | 14.83% | 6.49% | -6.67% | 36.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between XME and INDA is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XME and INDA has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XME vs. INDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XME
INDA
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
XME
INDA
Energy
XME
INDA
Technology
XME
INDA
Consumer Defensive
XME
INDA
Industrials
XME
INDA
Communication Services
XME
-
INDA
Consumer Cyclical
XME
-
INDA
Financial Services
XME
-
INDA
Healthcare
XME
-
INDA
Real Estate
XME
-
INDA
Utilities
XME
-
INDA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XME vs. INDA — Risk / Return Rank
XME
INDA
XME vs. INDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XME | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.88 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | -0.63 | +4.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | -1.46 | +11.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XME vs. INDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than INDA's maximum drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and INDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XME | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -45.07% | -40.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -18.69% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | -22.72% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.27% | -22.72% | -14.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | -45.07% | -16.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.33% | -17.77% | +8.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.09% | -9.59% | -34.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.05% | 8.09% | +0.96% |
Volatility
XME vs. INDA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) at 4.16%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XME | INDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.26% | 4.16% | +11.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.51% | 12.77% | +15.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.11% | 14.79% | +21.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.84% | 15.40% | +17.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.96% | 21.11% | +11.85% |
XME vs. INDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than INDA's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
XME vs. INDA - Dividend Comparison
XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDA iShares MSCI India ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.44% | 0.27% | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 0.90% | 1.19% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XME and INDA have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to INDA (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs INDA's -45.07%.
On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.60% vs 7.09% for INDA. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.
XME has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.
XME is categorized as Materials, while INDA is Asia Pacific Equities. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while INDA tracks MSCI India Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.69% for INDA.
XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XME and INDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer