XME vs. COPJ
XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and COPJ (Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while COPJ is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XME returned 40.70%/yr vs 46.22%/yr for COPJ. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for COPJ.
Performance
XME vs. COPJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 24.24% return, which is significantly higher than COPJ's 15.47% return.
XME
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 8.22%
- YTD
- 24.24%
- 6M
- 27.86%
- 1Y
- 101.48%
- 3Y*
- 40.70%
- 5Y*
- 23.61%
- 10Y*
- 19.99%
COPJ
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 14.83%
- YTD
- 15.47%
- 6M
- 29.69%
- 1Y
- 121.26%
- 3Y*
- 46.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XME vs. COPJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 24.24% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 3.50% |
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF | 15.47% | 140.63% | 11.07% | -5.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XME and COPJ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XME and COPJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
XME vs. COPJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XME
COPJ
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
XME
COPJ
Energy
XME
COPJ
-
Technology
XME
COPJ
Consumer Defensive
XME
COPJ
-
Industrials
XME
COPJ
-
Communication Services
XME
-
COPJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
XME
-
COPJ
-
Financial Services
XME
-
COPJ
-
Healthcare
XME
-
COPJ
-
Real Estate
XME
-
COPJ
-
Utilities
XME
-
COPJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XME vs. COPJ — Risk / Return Rank
XME
COPJ
XME vs. COPJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XME | COPJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.43 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 3.78 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.48 | 11.02 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XME | COPJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95 | 2.89 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 1.10 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
XME vs. COPJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than COPJ's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and COPJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XME | COPJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -32.28% | -53.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -32.28% | +9.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | -32.28% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -11.73% | +8.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.14% | -11.86% | -32.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.87% | 11.05% | -2.18% |
Volatility
XME vs. COPJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is 12.36%, while Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that XME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XME | COPJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.36% | 15.38% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.73% | 35.19% | -8.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.61% | 42.15% | -7.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.54% | 34.76% | -2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.84% | 34.76% | -1.92% |
XME vs. COPJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COPJ's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
XME vs. COPJ - Dividend Comparison
XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than COPJ's 10.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPJ Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF | 10.02% | 11.57% | 11.64% | 2.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XME and COPJ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPJ has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to XME (12.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs COPJ's -32.28%.
On 3-year performance, COPJ leads with 46.22% vs 40.70% for XME. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XME has been the lower-risk option at 12.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, COPJ has performed better with a 46.22% return vs 40.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.
COPJ has the higher dividend yield at 10.02%, compared with 0.30% for XME.
XME is categorized as Materials, while COPJ is Commodity Producers Equities. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.78% for COPJ.
XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XME and COPJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer