XME vs. ARKW
XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and ARKW (ARK Next Generation Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while ARKW is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by ARK. XME is passively managed, while ARKW is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XME returned 19.14%/yr vs 22.86%/yr for ARKW. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ARKW.
Performance
XME vs. ARKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 16.50% return, which is significantly higher than ARKW's -0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has underperformed ARKW with an annualized return of 19.14%, while ARKW has yielded a comparatively higher 22.86% annualized return.
XME
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 16.50%
- 6M
- 19.83%
- 1Y
- 85.37%
- 3Y*
- 35.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.93%
- 10Y*
- 19.14%
ARKW
- 1D
- 4.36%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- -1.16%
- 1Y
- 15.15%
- 3Y*
- 37.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- 22.86%
XME vs. ARKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 16.50% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | -0.20% | 38.93% | 42.27% | 96.89% | -67.49% | -18.85% | 157.44% | 35.76% | 4.24% | 87.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XME and ARKW is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014 | 0.44 |
The correlation between XME and ARKW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
XME vs. ARKW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XME
ARKW
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
XME
ARKW
-
Energy
XME
ARKW
-
Technology
XME
ARKW
Consumer Defensive
XME
ARKW
-
Industrials
XME
ARKW
Communication Services
XME
-
ARKW
Consumer Cyclical
XME
-
ARKW
Financial Services
XME
-
ARKW
Healthcare
XME
-
ARKW
-
Real Estate
XME
-
ARKW
-
Utilities
XME
-
ARKW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XME vs. ARKW — Risk / Return Rank
XME
ARKW
XME vs. ARKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XME | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.10 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 0.42 | +3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.44 | 0.85 | +8.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XME vs. ARKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than ARKW's maximum drawdown of -80.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and ARKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XME | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -80.52% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -36.21% | +13.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | -36.21% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.27% | -77.36% | +40.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | -80.52% | +18.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.18% | -20.01% | +10.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -23.97% | -20.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.07% | 17.93% | -8.86% |
Volatility
XME vs. ARKW - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) at 11.21%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XME | ARKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.14% | 11.21% | +3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.15% | 24.94% | +3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.17% | 33.21% | +2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.83% | 43.64% | -10.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.93% | 37.77% | -4.84% |
XME vs. ARKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKW's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
XME vs. ARKW - Dividend Comparison
XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than ARKW's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKW ARK Next Generation Internet ETF | 1.59% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 13.05% | 2.05% | 0.00% | 2.29% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XME and ARKW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to ARKW (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs ARKW's -80.52%.
On 10-year performance, ARKW leads with 22.86% vs 19.14% for XME. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ARKW has been the lower-risk option at 11.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ARKW has performed better with a 22.86% return vs 19.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ARKW.
ARKW has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.32% for XME.
XME is categorized as Materials, while ARKW is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.76% for ARKW.
XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XME and ARKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer