XMD.TO vs. XCV.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMD.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF) and XCV.TO (iShares Canadian Value Index ETF) are both Canada Equities funds from iShares - XMD.TO tracks the Morningstar Canada Sml GR CAD while XCV.TO tracks the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMD.TO returned 11.90%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for XCV.TO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMD.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for XCV.TO.

Performance

XMD.TO vs. XCV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF (XMD.TO) and iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMD.TO achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than XCV.TO's 19.17% return. Over the past 10 years, XMD.TO has underperformed XCV.TO with an annualized return of 11.90%, while XCV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.20% annualized return.

XMD.TO

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: 4.02%
• YTD: 12.81%
• 6M: 15.57%
• 1Y: 46.80%
• 3Y*: 27.16%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: 11.90%

XCV.TO

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.70%
• YTD: 19.17%
• 6M: 19.26%
• 1Y: 44.26%
• 3Y*: 27.30%
• 5Y*: 17.83%
• 10Y*: 13.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMD.TO vs. XCV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF	12.81%	41.38%	23.55%	10.01%	-4.90%	13.78%	6.05%	26.03%	-13.07%	6.17%
XCV.TO iShares Canadian Value Index ETF	19.17%	32.17%	21.26%	9.47%	1.87%	32.71%	-2.56%	18.02%	-11.15%	8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XMD.TO and XCV.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2006	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between XMD.TO and XCV.TO has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

XMD.TO vs. XCV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMD.TO

XMD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 68
XMD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
XMD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
XMD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
XMD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XMD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 64

XCV.TO

XCV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
XCV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
XCV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
XCV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XCV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
XCV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMD.TO vs. XCV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF (XMD.TO) and iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMD.TO	XCV.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	4.97	-2.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	6.62	-3.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	2.03	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	11.53	-8.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.51	43.47	-31.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMD.TO vs. XCV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is lower than the XCV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMD.TO and XCV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMD.TO	XCV.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	4.97	-2.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	1.39	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.85	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.54	+0.01

Drawdowns

XMD.TO vs. XCV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMD.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.42%, roughly equal to the maximum XCV.TO drawdown of -52.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMD.TO and XCV.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMD.TO	XCV.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.42%	-52.49%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.12%	-3.86%	-11.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	-9.71%	-5.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.16%	-18.08%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.40%	-41.18%	-2.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.17%	-0.89%	-3.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-6.67%	-1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	1.02%	+3.06%

Volatility

XMD.TO vs. XCV.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF (XMD.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to iShares Canadian Value Index ETF (XCV.TO) at 3.27%. This indicates that XMD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMD.TO	XCV.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.74%	3.27%	+2.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.26%	7.65%	+8.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.08%	8.96%	+10.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.59%	12.87%	+3.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.93%	15.54%	+1.39%

XMD.TO vs. XCV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMD.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XCV.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMD.TO vs. XCV.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than XCV.TO's 2.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XCV.TO iShares Canadian Value Index ETF	2.29%	2.71%	3.72%	3.88%	3.18%	2.11%	3.35%	3.06%	3.13%	2.40%	2.50%	3.14%
XMD.TO iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF	0.83%	0.97%	1.58%	1.91%	2.24%	1.17%	1.91%	2.55%	2.44%	1.76%	1.97%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMD.TO and XCV.TO in my portfolio?

XMD.TO and XCV.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XMD.TO or XCV.TO?

On fees, XCV.TO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMD.TO or XCV.TO?

XCV.TO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XMD.TO.

What is the main difference between XMD.TO and XCV.TO?

XMD.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Sml GR CAD, while XCV.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XMD.TO and 0.55% for XCV.TO.