PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XMD.TO vs. XCG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XMD.TO vs. XCG.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF (XMD.TO) and iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF (XCG.TO).

XMD.TO and XCG.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMD.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada Sml GR CAD. It was launched on Mar 2, 2001. XCG.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. It was launched on Nov 6, 2006. Both XMD.TO and XCG.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XMD.TO vs. XCG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF (XMD.TO) and iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF (XCG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XMD.TO vs. XCG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF		7.32%41.38%23.55%10.01%-4.90%13.78%6.05%26.03%-13.07%6.17%
XCG.TO
iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF		-0.53%9.37%21.40%17.43%-11.67%15.98%11.25%28.29%-6.14%7.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMD.TO achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly higher than XCG.TO's -0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, XMD.TO has outperformed XCG.TO with an annualized return of 12.14%, while XCG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.

XMD.TO

1D
4.07%
1M
-8.77%
YTD
7.32%
6M
15.79%
1Y
51.11%
3Y*
24.72%
5Y*
15.89%
10Y*
12.14%

XCG.TO

1D
4.22%
1M
-7.85%
YTD
-0.53%
6M
-4.57%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
12.81%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
9.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF

iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF

Often compared with XMD.TO:
XMD.TO vs. XCS.TOXMD.TO vs. XIU.TOXMD.TO vs. CGL-C.TOXMD.TO vs. VFV.TOXMD.TO vs. XCSR.TOXMD.TO vs. VUN.TOXMD.TO vs. VEQT.TO
Often compared with XCG.TO:
XCG.TO vs. XGRO.TOXCG.TO vs. VGRO.TOXCG.TO vs. VUGXCG.TO vs. VFV.TOXCG.TO vs. SCHGXCG.TO vs. XEG.TOXCG.TO vs. VDY.TO

XMD.TO vs. XCG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMD.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XCG.TO's 0.55% expense ratio.

XMD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF
XCG.TO
iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF

Return for Risk

XMD.TO vs. XCG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XMD.TO
XMD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
XMD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
XMD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
XCG.TO
XCG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XCG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XCG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMD.TO vs. XCG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF (XMD.TO) and iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF (XCG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XMD.TOXCG.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

0.41

+2.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

0.68

+2.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.10

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

0.65

+2.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.24

2.30

+11.94

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMD.TO vs. XCG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMD.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the XCG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMD.TO and XCG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XMD.TOXCG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

0.41

+2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.54

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.59

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.36

+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between XMD.TO and XCG.TO is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XMD.TO vs. XCG.TO - Dividend Comparison

XMD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than XCG.TO's 0.50% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XMD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF		0.87%0.97%1.58%1.91%2.24%1.17%1.91%2.55%2.44%1.76%1.97%2.34%
XCG.TO
iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF		0.50%0.45%0.60%1.33%1.59%1.46%1.69%1.53%1.65%1.03%0.97%0.72%

Drawdowns

XMD.TO vs. XCG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMD.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.42%, roughly equal to the maximum XCG.TO drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMD.TO and XCG.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XMD.TOXCG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.42%

-52.64%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.12%

-15.27%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.16%

-21.61%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.40%

-32.14%

-11.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

-9.53%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-10.90%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

4.32%

-0.69%

Volatility

XMD.TO vs. XCG.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Completion Index ETF (XMD.TO) and iShares Canadian Growth Index ETF (XCG.TO) have volatilities of 8.82% and 8.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XMD.TOXCG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.82%

8.76%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.94%

17.47%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.98%

21.60%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

15.61%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

16.36%

+0.46%