PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMAY vs. UXJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMAY vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May (XMAY) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAY achieves a 2.71% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 8.46% return.


XMAY

1D
-0.47%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
2.71%
6M
2.73%
1Y
8.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UXJL

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
8.46%
6M
7.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAY vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XMAY and UXJL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2025

0.86

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMAY vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAY
XMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

UXJL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAY vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May (XMAY) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMAYUXJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.29

XMAY vs. UXJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMAY vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAY drawdown since its inception was -8.24%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAY and UXJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMAYUXJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-10.29%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-3.71%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-1.58%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

Volatility

XMAY vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMAYUXJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

14.58%

-10.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.47%

14.58%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.47%

14.58%

-7.11%

XMAY vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XMAY and UXJL have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

XMAY vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither XMAY nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XMAY and UXJL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMAY and UXJL have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

XMAY and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMAY and UXJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer