PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMAY vs. NVDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMAY vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May (XMAY) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAY achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.


XMAY

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.93%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.13%
1Y
10.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDO

1D
-2.46%
1M
14.15%
YTD
18.85%
6M
29.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAY vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XMAY and NVDO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMAY vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAY
XMAY Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAY vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - May (XMAY) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMAYNVDODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

33.30

XMAY vs. NVDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMAYNVDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

1.30

+0.05

Drawdowns

XMAY vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAY drawdown since its inception was -8.24%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAY and NVDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMAYNVDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-16.25%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-2.68%

+2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-4.99%

+4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

Volatility

XMAY vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMAYNVDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

31.93%

-28.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.46%

31.93%

-24.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.46%

31.93%

-24.47%

XMAY vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMAY vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

XMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XMAY and NVDO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XMAY.

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for XMAY.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XMAY and 0.77% for NVDO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMAY and NVDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer