XMAR vs. TLTW
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW).
XMAR and TLTW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMAR is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Mar 16, 2023. TLTW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the CBOE TLT 2% OTM Buywrite Index (USD). It was launched on Jun 18, 2022.
Performance
XMAR vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XMAR vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 1.40% | 10.30% | 10.10% | 10.30% |
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 1.44% | 11.36% | -2.18% | -6.45% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XMAR having a 1.40% return and TLTW slightly higher at 1.44%.
XMAR
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTW
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 7.46%
- 3Y*
- 0.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMAR vs. TLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTW's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XMAR vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank
XMAR
TLTW
XMAR vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMAR | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 0.84 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 1.17 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.15 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 1.42 | +0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 3.74 | +6.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMAR | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 0.84 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.90 | -0.03 | +1.92 |
Correlation
The correlation between XMAR and TLTW is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XMAR vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison
XMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.66%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLTW iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF | 13.66% | 14.82% | 14.47% | 19.59% | 8.71% |
Drawdowns
XMAR vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMAR drawdown since its inception was -7.29%, smaller than the maximum TLTW drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAR and TLTW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMAR | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.29% | -18.61% | +11.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.79% | -5.80% | -0.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -2.98% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -8.49% | +8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 2.20% | -1.20% |
Volatility
XMAR vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - March (XMAR) is 1.73%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that XMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XMAR | TLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 3.46% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.12% | 5.80% | -3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.86% | 8.91% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.64% | 11.55% | -5.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.64% | 11.55% | -5.91% |