XMAG vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - XMAG tracks the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index while DFND tracks the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XMAG returned 24.62% vs 0.20% for DFND. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMAG charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

XMAG vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XMAG

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 12.73%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 24.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 0.20%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMAG vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	12.73%	15.63%	-1.67%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	-2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between XMAG and DFND is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2024	0.17

XMAG vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMAG	DFND
Technology	25.3%	24.8%
Financial Services	17.3%	18.2%
Healthcare	13.0%	10.7%
Industrials	12.6%	17.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	3.5%
Energy	5.5%	1.7%
Communication Services	3.9%	0.8%
Utilities	3.4%	-
Real Estate	2.9%	2.0%
Basic Materials	2.5%	4.3%

Return for Risk

XMAG vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAG

XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 68
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMAG vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMAG	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	0.02	+2.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	0.11	+3.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.02	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	0.07	+3.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.15	0.13	+15.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMAG vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMAG Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAG and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMAG	DFND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	0.02	+2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.11	0.36	+0.76

Drawdowns

XMAG vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAG drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAG and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMAG	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.17%	-22.65%	+6.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.29%	-3.44%	-3.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.69%	+3.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-5.70%	+3.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	3.70%	-2.07%

Volatility

XMAG vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that XMAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMAG	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	0.00%	+2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.65%	6.16%	+2.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.10%	10.92%	+0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.12%	22.46%	-7.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.12%	19.09%	-3.97%

XMAG vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMAG vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than DFND's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	0.46%	0.51%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMAG and DFND in my portfolio?

XMAG and DFND have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMAG or DFND?

XMAG has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMAG dropped -16.17% vs DFND's -22.65%.

Which ETF is better, XMAG or DFND?

On 1-year performance, XMAG leads with 24.62% vs 0.20% for DFND. On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMAG or DFND?

Over the 1-year period, XMAG has performed better with a 24.62% return vs 0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMAG or DFND?

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMAG or DFND?

DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.46% for XMAG.

What is the main difference between XMAG and DFND?

XMAG tracks BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMAG and 1.50% for DFND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.