XMA.TO vs. QQQ
XMA.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMA.TO is a Materials fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Materials TR, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMA.TO returned 14.00%/yr vs 22.80%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMA.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
XMA.TO vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XMA.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMA.TO achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 22.67% return. Over the past 10 years, XMA.TO has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 14.00%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.80% annualized return.
XMA.TO
- 1D
- -3.13%
- 1M
- 5.70%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 12.34%
- 1Y
- 64.71%
- 3Y*
- 35.49%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- 14.00%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 12.65%
- YTD
- 22.67%
- 6M
- 19.03%
- 1Y
- 43.44%
- 3Y*
- 30.21%
- 5Y*
- 21.31%
- 10Y*
- 22.80%
XMA.TO vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMA.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF | 7.60% | 99.21% | 20.72% | -2.04% | 1.35% | 3.31% | 19.73% | 24.63% | -10.46% | 7.07% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 22.84% | 15.23% | 36.37% | 51.45% | -27.77% | 26.27% | 46.11% | 32.13% | 8.34% | 24.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMA.TO and QQQ is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.16 |
XMA.TO vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMA.TO
QQQ
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
XMA.TO
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
XMA.TO
QQQ
Industrials
XMA.TO
QQQ
Communication Services
XMA.TO
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
XMA.TO
-
QQQ
Energy
XMA.TO
-
QQQ
Financial Services
XMA.TO
-
QQQ
Healthcare
XMA.TO
-
QQQ
Real Estate
XMA.TO
-
QQQ
Technology
XMA.TO
-
QQQ
Utilities
XMA.TO
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMA.TO vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
XMA.TO
QQQ
XMA.TO vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA.TO) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMA.TO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.50 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.55 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | 11.34 | -4.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMA.TO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.80 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.03 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 1.10 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 1.19 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
XMA.TO vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMA.TO drawdown since its inception was -64.13%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -31.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMA.TO and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMA.TO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.13% | -31.80% | -32.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.96% | -12.29% | -14.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.96% | -22.58% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.06% | -31.80% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.06% | -31.80% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.76% | 0.00% | -18.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.31% | -4.73% | -21.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.60% | 3.84% | +5.76% |
Volatility
XMA.TO vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.42% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.35%. This indicates that XMA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMA.TO | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.42% | 4.35% | +9.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.86% | 11.80% | +19.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.08% | 15.62% | +21.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.55% | 20.72% | +6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 20.82% | +5.74% |
XMA.TO vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMA.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMA.TO vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
XMA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
XMA.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.83% | 1.26% | 1.24% | 0.87% | 0.63% | 0.62% | 0.72% | 0.42% | 0.82% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMA.TO and QQQ have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XMA.TO.
XMA.TO is categorized as Materials, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. XMA.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Materials TR, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XMA.TO and 0.18% for QQQ.
Find the right allocation for XMA.TO and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer