XLVP.L vs. XSDR.L
XLVP.L (Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF) and XSDR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, from Invesco and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLVP.L returned 9.99%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for XSDR.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLVP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XSDR.L.
Performance
XLVP.L vs. XSDR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLVP.L achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly higher than XSDR.L's -2.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XLVP.L has outperformed XSDR.L with an annualized return of 9.99%, while XSDR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.09% annualized return.
XLVP.L
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -1.29%
- 1Y
- 16.58%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
XSDR.L
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- -2.48%
- 6M
- -1.61%
- 1Y
- 7.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.09%
XLVP.L vs. XSDR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLVP.L Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF | -1.84% | 6.91% | 3.77% | -3.87% | 8.97% | 29.14% | 8.22% | 16.79% | 10.30% | 11.00% |
XSDR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | -2.48% | 9.44% | 0.30% | 6.92% | 0.28% | 17.06% | 4.29% | 23.70% | 0.84% | 8.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLVP.L and XSDR.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XLVP.L and XSDR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLVP.L vs. XSDR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLVP.L
XSDR.L
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XLVP.L
XSDR.L
Basic Materials
XLVP.L
-
XSDR.L
-
Communication Services
XLVP.L
-
XSDR.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLVP.L
-
XSDR.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XLVP.L
-
XSDR.L
-
Energy
XLVP.L
-
XSDR.L
-
Financial Services
XLVP.L
-
XSDR.L
-
Industrials
XLVP.L
-
XSDR.L
-
Real Estate
XLVP.L
-
XSDR.L
-
Technology
XLVP.L
-
XSDR.L
-
Utilities
XLVP.L
-
XSDR.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLVP.L vs. XSDR.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLVP.L
XSDR.L
XLVP.L vs. XSDR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSDR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLVP.L | XSDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.09 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 0.56 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 1.31 | +2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLVP.L | XSDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.43 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.34 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.45 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.59 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
XLVP.L vs. XSDR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLVP.L drawdown since its inception was -19.67%, smaller than the maximum XSDR.L drawdown of -25.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVP.L and XSDR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLVP.L | XSDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -25.61% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -13.31% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -25.61% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.67% | -25.61% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.67% | -25.61% | +5.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.97% | -11.70% | +6.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -5.72% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 5.68% | -1.11% |
Volatility
XLVP.L vs. XSDR.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSDR.L) have volatilities of 5.43% and 5.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLVP.L | XSDR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 5.64% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 12.17% | -1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.76% | 17.23% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 15.89% | -1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 15.85% | 0.00% |
XLVP.L vs. XSDR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLVP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XSDR.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLVP.L vs. XSDR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLVP.L nor XSDR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLVP.L and XSDR.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XSDR.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLVP.L and 0.20% for XSDR.L.
Find the right allocation for XLVP.L and XSDR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer