PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSDR.L vs. HLTW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XSDR.L vs. HLTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSDR.L) and Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD (HLTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XSDR.L vs. HLTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSDR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
-0.72%9.44%0.30%6.92%0.28%17.06%4.29%23.70%0.84%8.44%
HLTW.L
Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD
-1.98%7.49%2.14%-2.07%5.56%21.73%9.62%18.18%7.56%9.73%
Different Trading Currencies

XSDR.L is traded in GBp, while HLTW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HLTW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSDR.L achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly higher than HLTW.L's -1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XSDR.L has underperformed HLTW.L with an annualized return of 7.97%, while HLTW.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.10% annualized return.


XSDR.L

1D
1.30%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
-0.72%
6M
4.18%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
7.97%

HLTW.L

1D
1.87%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-1.98%
6M
6.23%
1Y
3.50%
3Y*
3.22%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
9.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XSDR.L vs. HLTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSDR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HLTW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XSDR.L vs. HLTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSDR.L
XSDR.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XSDR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSDR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSDR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XSDR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSDR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

HLTW.L
HLTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
HLTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HLTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSDR.L vs. HLTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSDR.L) and Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD (HLTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSDR.LHLTW.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.33

0.22

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

0.41

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.05

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.55

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.86

1.12

+0.74

XSDR.L vs. HLTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSDR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the HLTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSDR.L and HLTW.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSDR.LHLTW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

0.22

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.45

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.59

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.82

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between XSDR.L and HLTW.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XSDR.L vs. HLTW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSDR.L nor HLTW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XSDR.L vs. HLTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSDR.L drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, which is greater than HLTW.L's maximum drawdown of -18.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSDR.L and HLTW.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XSDR.LHLTW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.61%

-26.58%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-9.73%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-19.19%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.61%

-26.58%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.10%

-6.33%

-3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-5.17%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

3.55%

+0.89%

Volatility

XSDR.L vs. HLTW.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Health Care ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSDR.L) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD (HLTW.L) at 5.07%. This indicates that XSDR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XSDR.LHLTW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

5.07%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

9.74%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.09%

16.10%

+2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.67%

13.79%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.80%

15.32%

+0.48%