XLVP.L vs. SPXP.L
XLVP.L (Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLVP.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLVP.L returned 9.99%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLVP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
XLVP.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLVP.L achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XLVP.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 9.99%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.
XLVP.L
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
XLVP.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLVP.L Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF | -1.84% | 6.91% | 3.77% | -3.87% | 8.97% | 29.14% | 8.22% | 16.79% | 10.30% | 11.00% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLVP.L and SPXP.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLVP.L and SPXP.L has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLVP.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLVP.L
SPXP.L
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
XLVP.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
XLVP.L
-
SPXP.L
Communication Services
XLVP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLVP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
XLVP.L
-
SPXP.L
Energy
XLVP.L
-
SPXP.L
Financial Services
XLVP.L
-
SPXP.L
Industrials
XLVP.L
-
SPXP.L
Real Estate
XLVP.L
-
SPXP.L
Technology
XLVP.L
-
SPXP.L
Utilities
XLVP.L
-
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLVP.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLVP.L
SPXP.L
XLVP.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLVP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.52 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 4.11 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 15.13 | -11.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLVP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 2.78 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 1.06 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 1.10 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.15 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
XLVP.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLVP.L drawdown since its inception was -19.67%, smaller than the maximum SPXP.L drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVP.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLVP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -25.46% | +5.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -7.09% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -20.77% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.67% | -20.77% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.67% | -25.46% | +5.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.97% | -0.21% | -4.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -3.50% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 1.93% | +2.64% |
Volatility
XLVP.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.43% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that XLVP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLVP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 2.65% | +2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 7.24% | +3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.76% | 10.49% | +4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 14.23% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 16.22% | -0.37% |
XLVP.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLVP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLVP.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLVP.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLVP.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLVP.L.
XLVP.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. XLVP.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLVP.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for XLVP.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer