PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLV vs. XLVP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLV vs. XLVP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XLV vs. XLVP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-4.77%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%
XLVP.L
Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF
-4.98%14.98%2.05%1.20%-2.68%27.97%11.54%21.48%4.05%21.56%
Different Trading Currencies

XLV is traded in USD, while XLVP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLVP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLV having a -4.77% return and XLVP.L slightly lower at -4.98%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLV having a 9.60% annualized return and XLVP.L not far behind at 9.32%.


XLV

1D
-0.62%
1M
-5.95%
YTD
-4.77%
6M
3.39%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
5.64%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
9.60%

XLVP.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
-4.98%
6M
3.84%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
9.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLV vs. XLVP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLVP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XLV vs. XLVP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

XLVP.L
XLVP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XLVP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLVP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLVP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XLVP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLVP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. XLVP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLVXLVP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

0.21

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.40

0.40

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.05

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

0.43

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.83

1.21

-0.38

XLV vs. XLVP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is comparable to the XLVP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and XLVP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLVXLVP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

0.21

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.42

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.57

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and XLVP.L is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XLV vs. XLVP.L - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while XLVP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.71%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%
XLVP.L
Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XLV vs. XLVP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than XLVP.L's maximum drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and XLVP.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVXLVP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-19.67%

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-12.64%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-19.67%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-19.67%

-8.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.98%

-6.46%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-4.57%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

5.30%

-0.17%

Volatility

XLV vs. XLVP.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) have volatilities of 4.77% and 4.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XLVXLVP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

4.72%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

9.72%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.64%

17.35%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

14.62%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

15.71%

+0.82%