PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLV vs. UNH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLV vs. UNH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than UNH's 21.04% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has underperformed UNH with an annualized return of 9.48%, while UNH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.95% annualized return.


XLV

1D
3.07%
1M
4.67%
YTD
-1.35%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
16.13%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
9.48%

UNH

1D
5.16%
1M
8.96%
YTD
21.04%
6M
20.61%
1Y
35.71%
3Y*
-5.49%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*
12.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. UNH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-1.35%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
21.04%-33.14%-2.41%0.80%6.94%45.20%21.25%20.00%14.52%39.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and UNH is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998

0.52

The correlation between XLV and UNH shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLV vs. UNH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

UNH
UNH Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
UNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
UNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNH Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. UNH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLVUNHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.24

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.73

2.72

+1.02

XLV vs. UNH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the UNH Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and UNH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLVUNHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

0.89

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.04

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.43

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.64

-0.17

Drawdowns

XLV vs. UNH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum UNH drawdown of -74.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and UNH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVUNHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-74.37%

+35.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-28.96%

+18.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

-61.39%

+44.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-61.39%

+44.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-61.39%

+32.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.68%

-34.27%

+29.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-14.76%

+7.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

13.19%

-8.86%

Volatility

XLV vs. UNH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is 5.04%, while UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that XLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVUNHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

8.19%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

31.20%

-20.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

40.16%

-25.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

31.87%

-17.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

30.18%

-13.61%

Dividends

XLV vs. UNH - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than UNH's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
2.23%2.64%1.62%1.38%1.21%1.12%1.38%1.41%1.38%1.30%1.48%1.59%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.65%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLV and UNH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UNH has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to XLV (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs UNH's -74.37%.

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLV and UNH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer