XLV vs. PPLT
XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) and PPLT (Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index, while PPLT is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLV returned 9.81%/yr vs 5.17%/yr for PPLT. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PPLT.
Performance
XLV vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than PPLT's -16.64% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has outperformed PPLT with an annualized return of 9.81%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.
XLV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
PPLT
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -13.20%
- YTD
- -16.64%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 38.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
XLV vs. PPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.23% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -16.64% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLV and PPLT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2010 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLV vs. PPLT — Risk / Return Rank
XLV
PPLT
XLV vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLV | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 0.80 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | 1.84 | +1.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLV vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum PPLT drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and PPLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLV | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.17% | -70.73% | +31.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -40.02% | +29.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.11% | -40.02% | +22.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | -40.02% | +22.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.40% | -51.14% | +22.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.59% | -38.39% | +34.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -39.94% | +32.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 17.37% | -13.00% |
Volatility
XLV vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is 4.90%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) has a volatility of 11.07%. This indicates that XLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLV | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 11.07% | -6.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 45.24% | -34.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 50.99% | -35.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 32.68% | -17.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 29.10% | -12.52% |
XLV vs. PPLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PPLT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLV vs. PPLT - Dividend Comparison
XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while PPLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPLT Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLV and PPLT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPLT has higher volatility (11.07%) compared to XLV (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs PPLT's -70.73%.
On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 9.81% vs 5.17% for PPLT. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 5.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PPLT.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.00% for PPLT.
XLV is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while PPLT is Precious Metals. XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while PPLT tracks Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.60% for PPLT.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLV and PPLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer