PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLV vs. CNCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLV vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XLV

1D
3.07%
1M
4.67%
YTD
-1.35%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
16.13%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
9.48%

CNCR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


XLV vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLV
CNCR

Healthcare

100.0%
96.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

3.3%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

XLV
100.0%
CNCR
96.6%

Basic Materials

XLV

-

CNCR

-

Communication Services

XLV

-

CNCR

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLV

-

CNCR

-

Consumer Defensive

XLV

-

CNCR

-

Energy

XLV

-

CNCR

-

Financial Services

XLV

-

CNCR
3.3%

Industrials

XLV

-

CNCR

-

Real Estate

XLV

-

CNCR

-

Technology

XLV

-

CNCR

-

Utilities

XLV

-

CNCR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLV vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CNCR
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLVCNCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.73

XLV vs. CNCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLVCNCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

Drawdowns

XLV vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and CNCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVCNCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

0.00%

-39.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.68%

0.00%

-4.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

0.00%

-7.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

Volatility

XLV vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVCNCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.97%

0.00%

+14.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.76%

0.00%

+14.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

0.00%

+16.57%

XLV vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLV vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNCR
Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.65%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.79% for CNCR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLV and CNCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer