XLV vs. CNCR
XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XLV tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index while CNCR tracks the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. Both are passively managed. XLV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.
Performance
XLV vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XLV
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 16.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
CNCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLV vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -3.17% |
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% |
XLV vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLV
CNCR
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XLV
CNCR
Basic Materials
XLV
-
CNCR
-
Communication Services
XLV
-
CNCR
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLV
-
CNCR
-
Consumer Defensive
XLV
-
CNCR
-
Energy
XLV
-
CNCR
-
Financial Services
XLV
-
CNCR
Industrials
XLV
-
CNCR
-
Real Estate
XLV
-
CNCR
-
Technology
XLV
-
CNCR
-
Utilities
XLV
-
CNCR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLV vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank
XLV
CNCR
XLV vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLV | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLV | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | — | — |
Drawdowns
XLV vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and CNCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLV | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.17% | 0.00% | -39.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.68% | 0.00% | -4.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | 0.00% | -7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | — | — |
Volatility
XLV vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLV | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 0.00% | +14.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.76% | 0.00% | +14.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 0.00% | +16.57% |
XLV vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLV vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison
XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.65% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.
XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.79% for CNCR.
Find the right allocation for XLV and CNCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer