XLV vs. CNCR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) and CNCR (Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XLV tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index while CNCR tracks the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. Both are passively managed. XLV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CNCR.

Performance

XLV vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XLV

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 5.26%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 6M: 0.74%
• 1Y: 18.26%
• 3Y*: 7.63%
• 5Y*: 6.07%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

CNCR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.37%
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%

XLV vs. CNCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLV	CNCR
Healthcare	100.0%	96.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	3.3%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLV vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV

XLV Risk / Return Rank: 37
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 35
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CNCR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLV	CNCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.13	—	—

Drawdowns

XLV vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and CNCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLV	CNCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.17%	0.00%	-39.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	0.00%	-2.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.11%	0.00%	-7.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.43%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLV	CNCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.13%	0.00%	+15.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.79%	0.00%	+14.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.57%	0.00%	+16.57%

XLV vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLV vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while CNCR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.63%	1.60%	1.67%	1.59%	1.47%	1.33%	1.49%	2.17%	1.57%	1.47%	1.60%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XLV or CNCR?

On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLV or CNCR?

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CNCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLV or CNCR?

XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.00% for CNCR.

What is the main difference between XLV and CNCR?

XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while CNCR tracks Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.79% for CNCR.