XLV vs. ARCC
XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index, while ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLV returned 9.81%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for ARCC. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLV vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 9.81%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.20% annualized return.
XLV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
ARCC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -2.87%
- 1Y
- -3.87%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
XLV vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.23% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -2.20% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 36.14% | 0.86% | 31.30% | 8.81% | 4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLV and ARCC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLV and ARCC has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLV vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
XLV
ARCC
XLV vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLV | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.97 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | -0.26 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | -0.47 | +3.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLV vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLV | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.17% | -79.36% | +40.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -19.35% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.11% | -19.35% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | -21.76% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.40% | -56.77% | +28.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.59% | -10.98% | +7.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -9.10% | +1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 10.68% | -6.31% |
Volatility
XLV vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.72%. This indicates that XLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLV | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 3.72% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 14.83% | -4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 18.48% | -3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 19.96% | -5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 25.58% | -9.00% |
Dividends
XLV vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than ARCC's 9.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 7.48% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLV and ARCC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to ARCC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLV and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer