PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLV vs. ARCC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLV vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has underperformed ARCC with an annualized return of 9.81%, while ARCC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.20% annualized return.


XLV

1D
-0.18%
1M
4.90%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
0.67%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
9.81%

ARCC

1D
1.00%
1M
1.69%
YTD
-2.20%
6M
-2.87%
1Y
-3.87%
3Y*
10.27%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.23%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
-2.20%1.07%19.78%20.03%-3.84%36.14%0.86%31.30%8.81%4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and ARCC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between XLV and ARCC has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLV vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ARCC
ARCC Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ARCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCC Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLVARCCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.97

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

-0.26

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.31

-0.47

+3.79

XLV vs. ARCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the ARCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and ARCC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLV vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and ARCC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVARCCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-79.36%

+40.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-19.35%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

-19.35%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-21.76%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-56.77%

+28.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-10.98%

+7.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-9.10%

+1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

10.68%

-6.31%

Volatility

XLV vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.72%. This indicates that XLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVARCCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

3.72%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

14.83%

-4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.03%

18.48%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

19.96%

-5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

25.58%

-9.00%

Dividends

XLV vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than ARCC's 9.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
7.48%9.49%8.77%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.63%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLV and ARCC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLV has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to ARCC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs ARCC's -79.36%.

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLV and ARCC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer