XLUI vs. CMDT
XLUI (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XLUI is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by State Street, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. XLUI is actively managed, while CMDT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. XLUI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.
Performance
XLUI vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLUI achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than CMDT's 13.43% return.
XLUI
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMDT
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -8.86%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLUI vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLUI State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 8.84% | 0.27% |
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 13.43% | 5.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLUI and CMDT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLUI vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank
XLUI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CMDT
XLUI vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLUI) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLUI | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLUI vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLUI drawdown since its inception was -6.01%, smaller than the maximum CMDT drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUI and CMDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLUI | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.01% | -11.11% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -11.11% | +10.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.98% | -2.77% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.25% | — |
Volatility
XLUI vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLUI | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.17% | 12.65% | -1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.17% | 12.24% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.17% | 12.24% | -1.07% |
XLUI vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLUI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLUI vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison
XLUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.35%, more than CMDT's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 2.67% | 3.04% | 8.80% | 2.71% |
XLUI State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.35% | 7.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLUI and CMDT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLUI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLUI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMDT.
XLUI has the higher dividend yield at 12.35%, compared with 2.67% for CMDT.
XLUI is categorized as Utilities Equities, while CMDT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLUI and 0.65% for CMDT.
Find the right allocation for XLUI and CMDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer