XLU vs. XLV

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.33%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for XLV. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.

Performance

XLU vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLU having a 9.33% annualized return and XLV not far ahead at 9.61%.

XLU

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -2.98%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 6M: 3.91%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 14.14%
• 5Y*: 9.56%
• 10Y*: 9.33%

XLV

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: -0.75%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 17.00%
• 3Y*: 7.44%
• 5Y*: 6.32%
• 10Y*: 9.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	4.61%	16.03%	23.31%	-7.18%	1.44%	17.70%	0.51%	25.93%	3.94%	12.05%
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	-0.75%	14.50%	2.47%	2.07%	-2.08%	26.04%	13.30%	20.45%	6.28%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and XLV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998	0.44

The correlation between XLU and XLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLU vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLU	XLV
Utilities	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	100.0%
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

XLU vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU

XLU Risk / Return Rank: 25
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 24
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 24

XLV

XLV Risk / Return Rank: 32
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 31
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLU	XLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.14	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	1.80	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.20	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	1.63	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.12	3.92	-0.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLU vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLU	XLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	1.14	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.43	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.58	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.46	-0.06

Drawdowns

XLU vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and XLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLU	XLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.98%	-39.17%	-12.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.18%	-10.47%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.26%	-17.11%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.26%	-17.11%	-8.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.07%	-28.40%	-7.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.43%	-4.10%	-2.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-7.12%	-3.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.13%	4.34%	-0.21%

Volatility

XLU vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.05%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLU	XLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.44%	5.05%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.55%	10.68%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.49%	14.98%	-0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.32%	14.75%	+2.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.26%	16.57%	+2.69%

XLU vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLU and XLV have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLU vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than XLV's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.68%	2.71%	2.96%	3.39%	2.92%	2.79%	3.14%	2.95%	3.33%	3.33%	3.41%	3.67%
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.64%	1.60%	1.67%	1.59%	1.47%	1.33%	1.49%	2.17%	1.57%	1.47%	1.60%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLU and XLV in my portfolio?

XLU and XLV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLU or XLV?

XLU has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to XLV (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs XLV's -39.17%.

Which ETF is better, XLU or XLV?

On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 9.61% vs 9.33% for XLU. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLU or XLV?

Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLU or XLV?

XLU and XLV have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLU or XLV?

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.64% for XLV.

What is the main difference between XLU and XLV?

XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.