XLU vs. XAR
XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.26%/yr vs 18.54%/yr for XAR. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
XLU vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 15.26% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed XAR with an annualized return of 9.26%, while XAR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.54% annualized return.
XLU
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 14.60%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
XAR
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 11.31%
- 1Y
- 40.45%
- 3Y*
- 33.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.54%
- 10Y*
- 18.54%
XLU vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 6.16% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 15.26% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLU and XAR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.30 |
The correlation between XLU and XAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLU vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLU
XAR
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XLU
XAR
-
Basic Materials
XLU
-
XAR
-
Communication Services
XLU
-
XAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLU
-
XAR
-
Consumer Defensive
XLU
-
XAR
-
Energy
XLU
-
XAR
-
Financial Services
XLU
-
XAR
-
Healthcare
XLU
-
XAR
-
Industrials
XLU
-
XAR
Real Estate
XLU
-
XAR
-
Technology
XLU
-
XAR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLU vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
XLU
XAR
XLU vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLU | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.24 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.36 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.39 | 6.60 | -3.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLU vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than XAR's maximum drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLU | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -46.37% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -17.22% | +8.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.26% | -19.73% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -32.40% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -46.37% | +10.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.05% | -5.02% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -6.78% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.31% | 6.15% | -1.84% |
Volatility
XLU vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) is 5.26%, while SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that XLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLU | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 10.60% | -5.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 23.50% | -11.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 28.02% | -13.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 23.69% | -6.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 24.77% | -5.49% |
XLU vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLU vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than XAR's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.34% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.30% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLU and XAR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to XLU (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs XAR's -46.37%.
On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 18.54% vs 9.26% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 18.54% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 0.34% for XAR.
XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XAR is Aerospace & Defense. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.35% for XAR.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLU and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer