PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLU vs. UTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLU vs. UTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly lower than UTG's 16.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed UTG with an annualized return of 9.19%, while UTG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.


XLU

1D
1.86%
1M
-5.69%
YTD
3.55%
6M
1.36%
1Y
9.88%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
9.19%

UTG

1D
0.91%
1M
-2.25%
YTD
16.97%
6M
15.34%
1Y
28.44%
3Y*
24.43%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. UTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.55%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
16.97%23.24%28.10%2.84%-13.38%14.26%-5.25%33.65%1.84%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and UTG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2004

0.58

The correlation between XLU and UTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLU vs. UTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

UTG
UTG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTG Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
UTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTG Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. UTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLUUTGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

1.72

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.01

2.21

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.51

-1.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.52

5.60

-3.09

XLU vs. UTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the UTG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and UTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLUUTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.72

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.69

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.50

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.48

-0.09

Drawdowns

XLU vs. UTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, smaller than the maximum UTG drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and UTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUUTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.98%

-67.77%

+15.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-11.59%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-15.03%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-26.54%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-47.91%

+11.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

-3.41%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-8.74%

-1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

5.18%

-1.11%

Volatility

XLU vs. UTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) is 5.41%, while Reaves Utility Income Trust (UTG) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that XLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUUTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

6.08%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.76%

12.89%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.56%

16.66%

-2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.80%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

21.59%

-2.33%

Dividends

XLU vs. UTG - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than UTG's 5.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UTG
Reaves Utility Income Trust
5.69%6.42%7.19%8.53%8.07%6.35%6.59%5.69%6.86%6.21%9.02%6.86%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.71%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLU and UTG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UTG has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to XLU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs UTG's -67.77%.

UTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLU and UTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer