XLU vs. SBAC
XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while SBAC (SBA Communications Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.20%/yr vs 8.40%/yr for SBAC. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLU vs. SBAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than SBAC's 7.24% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has outperformed SBAC with an annualized return of 9.20%, while SBAC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.
XLU
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 11.85%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
SBAC
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- 1Y
- -8.09%
- 3Y*
- -1.81%
- 5Y*
- -6.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
XLU vs. SBAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.04% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 7.24% | -3.13% | -18.18% | -8.15% | -27.30% | 38.95% | 17.81% | 49.30% | -0.90% | 58.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLU and SBAC is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 1999 | 0.33 |
The correlation between XLU and SBAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLU vs. SBAC — Risk / Return Rank
XLU
SBAC
XLU vs. SBAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLU | SBAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.98 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | -0.27 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | -0.51 | +3.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLU vs. SBAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, smaller than the maximum SBAC drawdown of -99.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and SBAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLU | SBAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -99.65% | +47.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -29.80% | +20.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.26% | -32.21% | +14.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -54.50% | +29.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -54.50% | +18.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -43.24% | +37.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -35.39% | +25.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 15.94% | -11.69% |
Volatility
XLU vs. SBAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) is 5.59%, while SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) has a volatility of 10.25%. This indicates that XLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLU | SBAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 10.25% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 27.71% | -16.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 32.49% | -17.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 29.34% | -12.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 28.12% | -8.85% |
Dividends
XLU vs. SBAC - Dividend Comparison
XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than SBAC's 2.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBAC SBA Communications Corporation | 2.30% | 2.30% | 1.92% | 1.34% | 1.01% | 0.60% | 0.66% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.67% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLU and SBAC have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBAC has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to XLU (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs SBAC's -99.65%.
XLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLU and SBAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer