PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBAC vs. LAMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBAC vs. LAMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) and Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBAC achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly lower than LAMR's 20.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SBAC has underperformed LAMR with an annualized return of 7.75%, while LAMR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.07% annualized return.


SBAC

1D
-3.84%
1M
-9.69%
YTD
2.75%
6M
6.30%
1Y
-13.08%
3Y*
-2.65%
5Y*
-7.26%
10Y*
7.75%

LAMR

1D
0.01%
1M
7.22%
YTD
20.32%
6M
17.16%
1Y
31.62%
3Y*
23.18%
5Y*
12.95%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBAC vs. LAMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBAC
SBA Communications Corporation
2.75%-3.13%-18.18%-8.15%-27.30%38.95%17.81%49.30%-0.90%58.20%
LAMR
Lamar Advertising Company (REIT)
20.32%9.73%19.98%18.56%-18.04%51.29%-3.19%35.32%-1.92%15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SBAC and LAMR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 1999

0.34

The correlation between SBAC and LAMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SBAC:

$20.82B

LAMR:

$15.27B

EPS

SBAC:

$9.50

LAMR:

$5.42

PE Ratio

SBAC:

20.65

LAMR:

27.77

PEG Ratio

SBAC:

0.42

LAMR:

1.81

PS Ratio

SBAC:

7.36

LAMR:

6.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBAC:

$2.85B

LAMR:

$2.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBAC:

$1.28B

LAMR:

$541.09M

EBITDA (TTM)

SBAC:

$1.74B

LAMR:

$1.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBAC vs. LAMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBAC
SBAC Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SBAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBAC Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SBAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBAC Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

LAMR
LAMR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LAMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAMR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
LAMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAMR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBAC vs. LAMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) and Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBACLAMRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.41

1.43

-1.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.50

2.07

-2.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.27

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

3.13

-3.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.85

8.62

-9.47

SBAC vs. LAMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBAC Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the LAMR Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBAC and LAMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBACLAMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

1.43

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.49

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.41

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.21

+0.02

Drawdowns

SBAC vs. LAMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBAC drawdown since its inception was -99.65%, which is greater than LAMR's maximum drawdown of -91.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBAC and LAMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBACLAMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.65%

-91.85%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.80%

-10.04%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.21%

-23.86%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.50%

-30.09%

-24.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.50%

-65.79%

+11.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.62%

-4.72%

-40.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-26.41%

-8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.78%

3.65%

+12.13%

Volatility

SBAC vs. LAMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SBA Communications Corporation (SBAC) is 7.25%, while Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR) has a volatility of 10.47%. This indicates that SBAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBACLAMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.25%

10.47%

-3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.92%

15.38%

+11.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.66%

22.24%

+9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.16%

26.75%

+2.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.05%

34.67%

-6.62%

Dividends

SBAC vs. LAMR - Dividend Comparison

SBAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than LAMR's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LAMR
Lamar Advertising Company (REIT)
4.32%5.10%4.64%4.70%5.30%3.30%3.00%4.30%5.28%4.47%4.49%4.58%
SBAC
SBA Communications Corporation
2.41%2.30%1.92%1.34%1.01%0.60%0.66%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SBAC vs. LAMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SBA Communications Corporation and Lamar Advertising Company (REIT). You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
703.44M
528.00M
(SBAC) Total Revenue
(LAMR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SBAC vs. LAMR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SBA Communications Corporation and Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
SBAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SBA Communications Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 703.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LAMR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 528.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

SBAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SBA Communications Corporation reported an operating income of 342.85M and revenue of 703.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.7%.

LAMR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) reported an operating income of 146.06M and revenue of 528.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

SBAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SBA Communications Corporation reported a net income of 184.83M and revenue of 703.44M, resulting in a net margin of 26.3%.

LAMR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) reported a net income of 101.29M and revenue of 528.00M, resulting in a net margin of 19.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SBAC and LAMR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAMR has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to SBAC (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBAC dropped -99.65% vs LAMR's -91.85%.

LAMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBAC and LAMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer