XLU vs. AMLP
XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.20%/yr vs 6.92%/yr for AMLP. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.
Performance
XLU vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 15.29% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 9.20%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.92% annualized return.
XLU
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 15.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
XLU vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.04% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 15.29% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLU and AMLP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010 | 0.25 |
The correlation between XLU and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLU vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLU
AMLP
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
XLU
AMLP
Basic Materials
XLU
-
AMLP
-
Communication Services
XLU
-
AMLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLU
-
AMLP
-
Consumer Defensive
XLU
-
AMLP
-
Energy
XLU
-
AMLP
Financial Services
XLU
-
AMLP
-
Healthcare
XLU
-
AMLP
-
Industrials
XLU
-
AMLP
-
Real Estate
XLU
-
AMLP
-
Technology
XLU
-
AMLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLU vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
XLU
AMLP
XLU vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLU | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.66 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 5.35 | -2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLU vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLU | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -77.19% | +25.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -8.94% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.26% | -14.27% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -20.92% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -72.62% | +36.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -4.94% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -17.37% | +7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 2.77% | +1.48% |
Volatility
XLU vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 4.71%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLU | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 4.71% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 8.77% | +2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 11.84% | +2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 19.95% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 27.67% | -8.40% |
XLU vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLU vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than AMLP's 7.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.71% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.67% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLU and AMLP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLU has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to AMLP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.20% vs 6.92% for AMLP. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.20% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.71%, compared with 2.67% for XLU.
XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while AMLP is MLPs. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLU and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer